Skip to content

ED Charting and Coding: Physical Exam (PE)


computer-charting-TEXT-canstockphoto17902161“What do I see, hear, and smell when I walk into the room?” While the oral boards challenge you to perform the physical exam in a certain way, the day to day examination of patients can vary dramatically. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), however, has physical exam guidelines for billing that conform to neither the exam you learned as a medical student nor the one you’ve refined as a resident. These disparities between what you do and how you’re asked to document it can lead to charts that are frequently down-coded or at risk if audited. The following discussion tries to unravel some of these twisted regulations and will provide tips and tricks on how to improve your physical exam documentation for coding and billing.

Double Standards

“There are no straight backs, no symmetrical faces, many wry noses, and no even legs. We are a crooked and perverse generation.” – Sir William Osler

There are 2 very different standards used to bill CMS and/or insurance companies: the 1995 and 1997 CMS guidelines. Overall, 1995 is too vague, 1997 is too specific, and the responsibility to choose one or the other falls on your coding department.

The 1995 guidelines identify Body Areas and Organ Systems as a framework for documenting the physical exam, but do not say what to chart under either.

The 1997 guidelines define mandatory physical exam elements and called them Bullets. A comprehensive exam requires all bulleted items to be examined, and at least 2 per system to be documented. The full list of bullets is in the appendix at the end of this post. These guidelines also describe Single Organ System examinations, which focus on a primary organ system but require bullets from other systems. Don’t bother looking these up– in general, a comprehensive single organ system examination is more complicated to perform and document than a comprehensive multi-system exam.


* 1995 guidelines allow a combination of systems & body areas for PF, EPF, & Detailed exams.  ** 1997 multi-system exam requires specific bullets for each system.

Work Smarter, Not Harder: Resuscitating the Physical Exam

  • Develop a structured, comprehensive exam that you can perform on nearly any patient, and use the normal findings for this exam as your documentation template. If your department uses the 1997 guidelines, read through the bullets and pick 2 per system to include in your exam.
  • Your examination is part of your decision making. The chief complaint will indicate certain positive or negative findings to be documented.
  • With many EMRs, vital signs are usually automatically pulled into your note. In addition to reviewing all vitals as part of good patient care, include a statement in your documentation that the recorded vital signs were reviewed.

Sample template for normal comprehensive physical exam

Vital Signs: P / BP / RR / SpO2 / T [1]
I have reviewed the triage vital signs.

  1. Const: Well-nourished, Well-developed (WNWD), Young/Middle-Aged/Elderly Male/Female appearing stated age [2].
  2. Eyes: PERRL [1], no conjunctival injection [2], and symmetrical lids [3].
  3. ENMT: Atraumatic external nose and ears [1]. Moist MM [2].
    * Neck: Symmetric, trachea midline [1], No thyromegaly [2].
  4. CVS: +S1/S2, No murmurs or gallops [1]. Peripheral pulses 2+ and equal in all extremities [2].
  5. RESP: Unlabored respiratory effort [1]. Clear to auscultation bilaterally (CTAB) [2].
  6. GI: Nontender/Nondistended (NTND) [1], No hepatosplenomegaly (HSM) [2].
  7. MSK: Normocephalic/Atraumatic (NC/AT) [1], Extremities w/o deformity or ttp [2]. No cyanosis or clubbing [3]
  8. Skin: Warm, Dry [1]. No rashes or lesions [2].
  9. Neuro: CNs II-XII grossly intact [1]. Sensation grossly intact [2].
  10. Psych: Awake, Alert, & Oriented (AAO) x3 [1]. Appropriate mood and affect [2].

The 10 listed items are for both the 1995 and 1997 guidelines. The bracketed red numbers are the bullets for the 1997 guidelines. The * counts as a system/area in the 1997 guidelines.

Final Tips

  • Although technically acceptable under 1995 guidelines, avoid charting only “normal” or “abnormal” under a system, instead list specific abnormal or pertinent normal findings.
  • Find out which guidelines your coders use: the list of organ systems is mostly the same, but the 1997 rules require far more specific information.
  • From an ethical and medical legal perspective, if you document it, examine it! Tailor your smart phrases or macros to a list of normals you reliably perform on every patient, every time, and include placeholders for you to add patient-specific information.
  • If your department utilizes scribes (or incorporates medical student notes), take an extra second to review their documentation for completeness and accuracy.

Additional Reading

Appendix: Full list of Organ Systems and Body Areas
Ted Fan, MD

Ted Fan, MD

Emergency Medicine Chief Resident
Department of Emergency Medicine
George Washington University
Joshua Burkhardt, MD

Joshua Burkhardt, MD

Emergency Medicine Chief Resident
Department of Emergency Medicine
Wright State University
Bjorn Watsjold, MD

Bjorn Watsjold, MD

Emergency Medicine Chief Resident
Division of Emergency Medicine
University of Washington
Bjorn Watsjold, MD

Latest posts by Bjorn Watsjold, MD (see all)