Educational resources discussing lifestyle, public policy, and wellness relevant for all healthcare providers
Introducing Open, Post-Publication, Expert Peer Review on ALiEM
Today, we are busting open the concept of peer review for publications on blogs!
The peer review process has been criticized for its flaws, but is universally accepted as a necessary part of the scientific process. Peer reviewing allows experts in a field to determine the validity of a study or an article so that those of us who are less expert can reap the benefits of their knowledge. Until recently this process was almost universally pre-publication and anonymous. Authors would go through months of review and revision based on feedback of experts whose name they didn’t even know. In the last decade journals such as BMJ Open moved to an open peer review process by divulging the reviewer’s identities to the author and publishing the reviews of the experts online for open access to all readers. This open peer review model prevents redundancy and encourages transparency in the scientific process.
![Desouza, Natalie[2]](https://i0.wp.com/www.aliem.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Desouza-Natalie2.jpg?resize=150%2C150&ssl=1)


Welcome to my inaugural post on ALiEM! My goal for this new series of missives is to inspire discussion about aspects of our life in EM, beyond the day-to-day clinical work. I chose emergency medicine not only for the clinical challenge, but also for the potential public health impact. After all, we are the only specialty to consistently care for the poor, the disempowered, the mentally ill.