Phenobarbital as First-Line Medication for Alcohol Withdrawal: Have You Switched From Benzodiazepines Yet?

phenobarbital first line monotherapy for alcohol withdrawal

Are you using phenobarbital instead of benzodiazepines as the first-line monotherapy for patients in alcohol withdrawal in the Emergency Department (ED)? If not, you probably should be. Another old drug for a new indication, right? Well not exactly. Phenobarbital is indeed an older and relatively cheap drug (less than $20 per loading dose) that has gained some press recently for the treatment of acute alcohol withdrawal [1-3].

Why should you consider using phenobarbital as monotherapy rather than benzodiazepines?

Phenobarbital used to be one of the standard treatments for ethanol (EtOH) withdrawal prior to the introduction of benzodiazepines. However, there are key advantages over benzodiazepines.

  1. Phenobarbital has a dual mechanism of action, binding both the GABA receptor and glutamate receptors in the CNS [3]. This helps EtOH withdrawal symptoms by up-regulating GABA activity and down-regulating excitatory glutamate activity.
  2. Phenobarbital has a predictable metabolization with a long half-life of approximately 3-5 days, which allows the drug to self-taper after the initial loading dose and symptom control in the ED [1, 2]. This contrasts the relatively shorter half-life of many available benzodiazepines, which often require more frequent redosing.

Is phenobarbital safe for the treatment of EtOH withdrawal in the ED?

In short, yes. Several studies have indicated that dosing with phenobarbital (PO or IV) is safe and effective at decreasing the need for escalating doses of benzodiazepines for EtOH withdrawal [1-6]. In comparison to benzodiazepines, it demonstrated:

  • Fewer episodes of hypotension and apnea [1-6]
  • Decreased hospital and ICU stay duration in admitted patients [1]
  • Decreased requirement for ICU level care [1]

Dosing regimens

  • Common regimen: 10-15 mg/kg of IDEAL body weight (IBW) IV bolus over 30 minutes and administering 130-260 mg aliquots every 15-30 minutes for persistent symptoms [2]
    • Note that the patient’s IBW may be much lower than the actual body weight.
    • Use the MD Calc calculator for a patient’s IBW
    • Examples based on the average American height:
      • Male: 5’9” –> 71 kg IBW –> phenobarbital 710-1065 mg IV initial bolus
      • Female: 5’4” –> 55 kg IBW –> phenobarbital 550-825 mg IV initial bolus
  • Alternative lower dosing regimen: 130-260 mg IV boluses with repeated dosing as needed [3]
  • Maximum dose
    • No established maximum, but the absolute upper limit for dosing in epilepsy is 20-30 mg/kg [11]
    • Some sources recommend limiting the dose of phenobarbital in alcohol withdrawal to 15 mg/kg/day [3]
  • Adjuncts: Benzodiazepines may be added without decreasing safely [1]

Do patients need phenobarbital dosing adjustments if they have liver dysfunction?

  • Phenobarbital undergoes metabolization primarily in the liver, mostly by CYP2C9 [9].
  • “Dose adjustment” is recommended by the manufacturer in hepatic dysfunction, but no value is provided [10].
    • Since there is no recommended dosing adjustment in patients with cirrhosis and liver dysfunction, a conservative approach starting with the 130 mg boluses and titrating to the minimum effective dose would likely be the safest approach.
  • Clinical pearl: Hepatic encephalopathy is a strong contraindication to phenobarbital [9, 10].
    • Before administering a barbiturate to a cirrhotic patient for EtOH withdrawal, first ensure that hepatic encephalopathy is not the cause of the agitation or altered mental status.
    • Because patients with hepatic encephalopathy experience excess GABA stimulation, they are very sensitive to GABAergic medications (e.g., barbiturates or benzodiazepines).
    • Administration of benzodiazepines or barbiturates to these patients risk inducing a prolonged comatose state.

Is it safe to give phenobarbital to a patient who has already received benzodiazepines?

  • The concern with concurrent phenobarbital and benzodiazepine administration is oversedation. There is a paucity of evidence for this question, although preliminary data suggests that it is safe without significant mortality risk [1].
  • As a corollary, exercise caution when administering phenobarbital to patients at risk for sedation from any cause, such as hepatic encephalopathy, benzodiazepine abuse, and opioid abuse.
  • Suggested approach: If benzodiazepines have already been given, consider using the alternative, more conservative, lower dose regimen protocol (130-260 mg doses) up to 10-15 mg/kg total with close monitoring after every up-titration. Avoid giving benzodiazepines concurrently during the phenobarbital up-titration period to minimize the risk of oversedation and apnea [11].

Which patients treated with phenobarbital require admission?

There is a dearth of evidence about which patients require medical admission in the setting of phenobarbital administration. The American Society of Addiction Medicine has developed a tool to assist providers with disposition planning for patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome for all-comers (not necessarily those treated with phenobarbital) [2]. Their recommendations are as follows:

  • Outpatient management
    • Able to follow return precautions
    • Likely to continue with alcohol use disorder treatment
    • Supportive living environment
  • Inpatient management
    • Requires frequent physician and nursing intervention
    • Heavy sedation requirements or active delirium tremens
    • Coexisting medical diagnoses that require inpatient management (severe electrolyte anomalies, infections, pancreatitis, hepatic encephalopathy, etc.)
    • History of severe withdrawals, pregnancy, or concurrent medical condition requiring treatment

Conclusion

Phenobarbital has gained significant popularity for use in EtOH withdrawal in the last few years. Several factors make it ideal for use in EtOH withdrawal, primarily its long half-life allowing for a multi-day, self-tapering effect. The most commonly recommended dosing regimen starts with a 10 mg/IBW kg bolus followed by titration every 30 minutes afterwards. Patients in the ED often can be safely phenobarbital-loaded and discharged, assuming hemodynamic stability, normal alertness, and resolution of withdrawal symptoms. More rigorous studies are needed determine dose thresholds that warrant hospital admission.

References

  1. Rosenson J, Clements C, Simon B, et al. Phenobarbital for Acute Alcohol Withdrawal: A Prospective Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2013;44(3):592-598.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.056. PMID: 22999778
  2. Wolf C, Curry A, Nacht J, Simpson SA. Management of Alcohol Withdrawal in the Emergency Department: Current Perspectives. Open Access Emerg Med. 2020;12:53-65. doi:10.2147/OAEM.S235288. PMID: 32256131
  3. Long D, Long B, Koyfman A. The Emergency Medicine Management of Severe Alcohol Withdrawal. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017;35(7):1005-1011. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.02.002. PMID: 28188055
  4. Staidle A, Geier C. Phenobarbital and/or Benzodiazepines for Recurrent Alcohol Withdrawal: A Self-Controlled, Retrospective Cohort Study. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2022;54:263-266. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.020. PMID: 35219012
  5. Lebin JA, Mudan A, Murphy CE, Wang RC, Smollin CG. Return Encounters in Emergency Department Patients Treated with Phenobarbital Versus Benzodiazepines for Alcohol Withdrawal. J Med Toxicol. 2022;18(1):4-10. doi:10.1007/s13181-021-00863-2. PMID: 34697777
  6. Hendey GW, Dery R, Barnes R, Snowden B, Mentler P. A Prospective, Randomized, Trial of Phenobarbital Versus Benzodiazepines for Acute Alcohol Withdrawal. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2011;29(4):382-385. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2009.10.010. PMID: 20825805
  7. Hoffman PL, Grant KA, Snell LD, Reinlib L, Iorio K, Tabakoff B. NMDA Receptors: Role in Ethanol Withdrawal Seizures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1992;654(1):52-60. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb25955.x. PMID: 1321581
  8. Young GP, Rores C, Murphy C, Dailey RH. Intravenous Phenobarbital for Alcohol Withdrawal and Convulsions. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1987;16(8):847-850. doi:10.1016/S0196-0644(87)80520-6. PMID: 3619162
  9. Patsalos PN, Spencer EP, Berry DJ. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiepileptic Drugs in Epilepsy: A 2018 Update. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 2018;40(5):526-548. doi:10.1097/FTD.0000000000000546. PMID: 29957667
  10. Lewis CB, Adams N. Phenobarbital. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Accessed April 16, 2023.
  11. Farkas J. Alcohol withdrawal. EMCrit Project. Published March 29, 2023. Accessed April 18, 2023.
By |2023-05-31T19:25:45-07:00Jun 1, 2023|Neurology, Tox & Medications|

SAEM Clinical Images Series: Hey Doc, Can You Come Look at This Urine?

urine

A 4-year-old male with no significant past medical history presents as a transfer from an outside hospital for suspected inhalation burn secondary to a house fire. The patient was home with his father and sibling when the apartment caught fire from a suspected flame in the kitchen. The patient was evacuated from the building by fire rescue after an unknown period of time. He was intubated at the outside hospital due to concern for inhalation injury. It is unknown if the patient sustained any trauma prior to extraction.

Vitals: T 98.1°F; BP 120/64; P 126; RR 29; O2 Sat 100% on vent

General: Intubated and sedated.

HENT: Singed hair and soot noted to nares, soot in mouth and secretions.

Cardiovascular: Regular rate and rhythm.

Lungs: CTABL, no wheezing or stridor.

GU: Normal appearing genitalia, no blood at meatus or from rectum, dark red urine noted in foley bag.

Skin: 0% TBSA burns, no obvious signs of trauma.

CBC: WNL

ABG at outside hospital: pH 7.0, carboxyhemoglobin 10, methemoglobin 3, lactate 3.7

Repeat ABG after transfer: pH 7.22, carboxyhemoglobin 1.7, methemoglobin 3.7, lactate 2.1

Hydroxocobalamin should be given in any case of suspected cyanide toxicity. House fires are the most common cause of cyanide toxicity in industrialized nations. Cyanide toxicity can also occur due to occupational exposures, medications, foods, or intentional ingestion. Cyanide inhibits the electron transport chain thus blocking aerobic metabolism, leading to hypoxia. Patients can present with altered mental status, hemodynamic instability, and dysrhythmias. Labs will be significant for lactic acidosis. Hydroxocobalamin should be given as soon as cyanide toxicity is suspected. Hydroxocobalamin works by chelating cyanide and forming cyanocobalamin which is renally excreted. Hydroxocobalamin is relatively safe and non-toxic but can cause transient hypertension. It also can cause a reddish discoloration of the urine, skin, and mucous membranes that can last up to several days. This is not harmful to the patient but can cause interference in urinalysis results.

Take-Home Points

  • Hydroxocobalamin is the antidote for cyanide toxicity and should be given as soon as possible in suspected cases.
  • Hydroxocobalamin binds cyanide to form cyanocobalamin, which is excreted in the urine.
  • Hydroxocobalamin is relatively safe but can cause transient hypertension and a red urine discoloration that can interfere with urinalysis results.

  • Cescon DW, Juurlink DN. Discoloration of skin and urine after treatment with hydroxocobalamin for cyanide poisoning. CMAJ. 2009 Jan 20;180(2):251. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080727. PMID: 19153403; PMCID: PMC2621289.
  • Wong SL, Pudek M, Li D. Wine-Colored Plasma and Urine from Hydroxocobalamin Treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Feb;32(2):225-226. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3782-3. Epub 2016 Jun 23. PMID: 27338592; PMCID: PMC5264665.
  • Desai, S. & Su, Mark K. (2021). Cyanide Poisoning. In: UpToDate, Post TW (Ed), UpToDate,Waltham, MA. (Accessed on January 04, 2022.)
  • Lexicomp. (n.d.). Hydroxocobalamin (vitamin B12a supplement and cyanide antidote): Druginformation. UpToDate. Retrieved January 8, 2022,from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/hydroxocobalamin-vitamin-b12a-supplement-and-cyanide-antidote-drug-information

By |2023-02-11T20:46:19-08:00Feb 13, 2023|SAEM Clinical Images, Tox & Medications|

Suboxone and the Emergency Physician: Get Waivered Training

suboxone

Clinical scenario: A 56-year-old male with a past medical history of opioid use disorder presents to the emergency department with acute on chronic right lower flank pain. The patient states the pain was exacerbated while shoveling snow over the weekend and worsens with movement. He feels nauseous but denies any chest pain, shortness of breath, vomiting, abdominal pain, or pain with urination. He denies any history of kidney stones, recent surgeries, and recent injuries. He does not smoke cigarettes, but does drink alcohol almost daily.

His pain actually first started 2 months ago due to a work incident, for which he was prescribed a 1-month supply of hydrocodone for the pain. Although his severe pain reduced in intensity over the first 3 days, he states that he was unable to resist his urge for the painkillers and finished the supply over the next month. The patient was seen in another emergency department one week ago.

On physical exam, the patient seems restless and anxious appearing, but is alert and oriented x 3. His pupils are dilated and reactive to light. His skin is warm and flushed. The patient is tender in the right lower flank region and grimaces upon palpation. The remainder of his exam and vital signs are normal, except for being slightly tachycardic.

Diagnostic testing revealed a normal complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, and non-contrast abdomen/pelvis CT study. His urine toxicology report shows the presence of hydrocodone.

A Tale of 2 Possibilities in Management

Let us assume for a moment that 2 different providers are treating this patient.

  • Physician A treats the patient’s flank pain and nausea in the emergency department, while monitoring him for several hours. Afterwards, the patient is discharged home and instructed to follow up with his primary care physician. After a few days, however, the patient returns with similar symptoms and again with normal lab results and imaging studies.
  • Physician B treats the patient’s flank pain while also recognizing the patient’s opioid dependence by starting the patient on a suboxone treatment plan along with behavioral therapies to curb symptoms of withdrawal and cravings [1]. After a few days, his primary care physician notes that the patient drastically has reduced his dependence on opioids and was on the road to recovery.

Physician B’s approach illustrates the need for physicians to recognize themselves as opioid use disorder (OUD) providers. Part of this role involves understanding and recommending suboxone treatment plans to aid patients in their recovery from opioid addiction.

What is suboxone and why is it important?

Suboxone is a prescription medication that is used to treat opioid addiction in individuals and is composed of buprenorphine and naloxone. Buprenorphine is a drug that blocks opioid receptors and reduces a person’s urges by acting as a partial opioid agonist, while naloxone reverses opioid overdoses. Both components work in conjunction to prevent withdrawal symptoms and thereby helping individuals on the road to recovery. The treatment plan using suboxone is supplemented with a behavioral counseling program to help individuals affected by opioid addiction by targeting the underlying reason for their opioid use and discovering new coping mechanisms [1].

Get X-Waivered to Prescribe Buprenorphine

Based on the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000), the DEA-X waiver is a federal regulation that requires physicians to complete training followed by an administrative process in order to have the legal authority to prescribe buprenorphine [2]. Although the research that shows that buprenorphine is effective, only 5% of physicians nationwide are waivered, which limits access to life-saving medications and treatment for patients struggling with opioid addiction [3]. In a 2018 study, researchers demonstrated that 30% of rural Americans are without a buprenorphine provider, compared to the 2% of non-rural Americans [4]. Along with geographical disparities, other health disparities also exist. According to a study published by The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), among minority communities, African American and Latinx populations continue to have significantly lower access to substance-use treatment services [5]. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, it has become increasingly urgent to find innovative ways to help healthcare providers obtain their X-waiver.

2021 Policy Changes

New policy changes under the Biden administration have allowed for expansion of buprenorphine treatment programs for patients with opioid use disorder [6]. As of April 2021, clinicians are now able to complete an exemption form to opt-out of the 8-hour training requirement to obtain the X waiver [2, 6]. Instead, clinicians can now submit a notice of intent form among other documents to SAMHSA that allows clinicians to treat up to 30 patients. When caring for more than 30 patients, X-waiver training is required [2]. Although this a promising start, emergency physicians should continue plans to obtain a DEA-X waiver in order to obtain more formal education, to adjust to any future policy changes, and to treat more than 30 patients. The Get Waivered program offers FREE training courses for healthcare providers to obtain a DEA-X waiver remotely.

Challenges for the Emergency Physician in Managing Opioid Use Disorder

In an emergency department, physicians are often met with several challenges when treating patients with opioid use disorder. These challenges include, but not limited to [7]:

  1. Absent Social Norms (Lack of norms around treating OUD may decrease motivation to obtain the waiver)
  2. Increased Hassle Bias (Irrelevant details make task of completing waiver process more difficult and challenging)
  3. Lack of Salience (Are there any success stories associated with treating patients with OUD with buprenorphine?)

Nudging Physician Behavior

Patients affected by opioid addiction can also be helped by making key changes to physician behaviors. As an example, behavioral researchers at the Nudge Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital recommend using principles of social norming and increasing salience in order to increase the number of physicians that can prescribe buprenorphine [8]. Below are examples that can have lasting effects on how clinicians perceive and approach the opioid epidemic moving forward.

  1. Implement a Get Waivered month at their clinical setting. This establishes a social norm and increases the possibility of more providers obtaining an X-waiver.
  2. Create presentations about the Get Waivered program with detailed instruction on the steps involved in obtaining an X-waiver to minimize hassle bias.
  3. Recruit patients with opioid use disorder to discuss their stories of recovery using buprenorphine during a training session to improve salience [7].

What’s next?

Please register for upcoming FREE training sessions at getwaivered.com/remote to obtain your DEA X-waiver.

RegionDateTime
Get Waivered Southeast10/21/202212 PM EST
Get Waivered Northwest11/18/202212 PM EST

Note: The above dates/times are tentative and may be subject to change in the near future.

References

  1. Suboxone.” Addiction Center, 20 Nov. 2020. Accessed May 26, 2022.
  2. Buprenorphine.” SAMHSA. Accessed May 26, 2022.
  3. Berk, Justin. To Help Providers Fight The Opioid Epidemic, ‘X The X Waiver’: Health Affairs Blog. Health Affairs, 5 Mar. 2019. Accessed May 26, 2022.
  4. Andrilla C, Holly A, et al. Geographic Distribution of Providers With a DEA Waiver to Prescribe Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A 5‐Year Update. Wiley Online Library, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 20 June 2018. Accessed May 26, 2022.
  5. Double Jeopardy: COVID-19 and Behavioral Health Disparities for Black and Latino Communities in the U.S. (Submitted by OBHE) (samhsa.gov). PDF file. Accessed May 26, 2022.
  6. Cornish A. Why new guidelines for opioid treatment are a ‘big deal’. NPR. Published April 27, 2021. Accessed May 26, 2022.
  7. Bruno M and GetWaivered. “Implementation Archives.” Get Waivered.. Accessed May 26, 2022.
  8. Nakagawa J. Nudging ER Doctors To Prevent Opioid Overdoses. Cognoscenti, WBUR, 30 Jan. 2018. Accessed May 26, 2022.
By |2022-08-07T21:56:02-07:00Aug 12, 2022|Public Policy, Tox & Medications|
Go to Top