How I Educate Series: Tarlan Hedayati, MD

This week’s How I Educate post features Dr. Tarlan Hedayati, the Chair of Education at Cook County Hospital. Dr. Hedayati spends approximately 90% of her shifts with learners, including emergency medicine residents, off-service residents, and medical students. She describes her practice environment as a large, public, urban, Level 1 trauma center. Below she shares with us her approach to teaching learners on shift.

What delivery methods do use when teaching on shift?

Some of the other attendings joke that they know when I’ve been working because the garbage can is full of paper towels I’ve used to write on when I teach on shift.

What is your method for reviewing learners’ notes and how do you provide feedback on documentation?

Post shift. I usually send an email to the resident if there is something in the charting that can be improved upon or if the documentation is especially excellent.

Do you feel departmental flow and metrics adversely affect teaching? What is your approach to excelling at both?

Flow and metrics absolutely impact teaching and learning. If it’s too slow, the experiential component of education is lost. Too fast, and there isn’t time to make sure concepts and ideas are properly recognized and absorbed by learners. I try to verbally summarize things we have seen and learned toward the end of the shift as a recap so that learners are reminded of topics they should investigate further when they go home. I also incorporate specific cases in my written feedback so the resident can read it and remember notable pearls.

It can be difficult to sit back and let senior learners struggle what is your approach to not taking over prematurely?

As long as there is no risk to the patient, I let things play out. I am pretty confident that I can bail out of a bad situation and know that I need to let them practice. Learners have to figure out how to troubleshoot, how to think on the fly, how to correct their own errors, and how to learn from mistakes. I have to remind myself that the safest place for them to make mistakes is while I am by their side.

Do you start a teaching shift with certain objectives or develop them as a shift unfolds?

Both. I look ahead to see who I am working with and which areas I am covering. That way I can figure out whether I need to mentally access more fast-track topics, more critical care topics, or more bread-and-butter EM topics. I also look to see what year the resident is that I am working with so I can tailor my teaching to the appropriate level. Ultimately bedside teaching is dynamic though so I also need to be prepared to improvise on the fly.

Do you typically see patients before or after they are presented to you?

Before. It helps me organize my thoughts so I can drive the teaching in a more organized meaningful way.

How do you boost morale amongst learners on shift?

Food! Seriously though, I firmly believe there is a boomerang effect to outlook, mindset, and mood. Good morale has to start with me.

How do you provide learners feedback?

Verbal in real time on shift, written after shift

What tips would you give a resident or student to excel on their shift?

Stay curious–keep asking questions of your patients, co-workers, and attendings.

Are there any resources you use regularly with learners to educate during a shift?

LITFL (ECGs), YouTube and EM:RAP HD (for procedures), Google images (rashes)

What are your three favorite topics to teach during a shift?

ECGs, chest pain, and rashes.

Who are three other educators you’d like to answer these questions?

Anna Kalantari, George Willis, and Jenny Beck-Esmay.
How I Educate Series logo

Read other How I Educate posts for more tips on how to approach on-shift teaching.

By |2023-03-22T12:12:57-07:00Feb 1, 2023|How I Educate, Medical Education|

52 Articles in 52 Weeks, 3rd edition (2022)

How can I keep up with so many landmark articles in Emergency Medicine (EM)? This is an often asked question we hear from interns and residents. Published in 2013 (1st edition) and 2016 (2nd edition), the “52 Articles in 52 Weeks” compendium is a compilation of 52 journal articles provided interns a list to read over a 52-week period, at an average pace of 1 journal article per week. We present the updated 2022 compilation.

Methodology for Article Selection

We primarily build off of the original list from 2016. These 52 articles were refreshed such that newer landmark articles replaced those on the same topic.  Additional publications were considered if they were cited on MDCalc’s site or reviewed on clinical EM websites like REBEL EM, Wiki Journal Club, and The Bottom Line during 2016-2022. A panel of 7 EM faculty with a niche in graduate medical education could also add publications for consideration. A total of 71 articles were scored by these 7 faculty using the Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM) score with an EM intern audience in mind.

Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM) Scoring [1]

Question for reviewer: Assuming that the results of this article are valid, how much does this article impact on EM clinical practice?

BEEM ScoreDescription (revised for EM intern audience)
1Useless information
2Not really interest, not really new, changes nothing
3Interesting and new, but doesn’t change practice
4Interesting and new, has the potential to change practice
5New and important: this would probably change practice for some EM interns
6New and important: this would change practice for most EM interns
7This is a “must know for EM interns

Results

The final list of the top 52 articles, based on the mean BEEM scores, are presented below in descending rank order. A bonus 53rd article is also listed because there was a 4-way tie for articles #50-53. Feel free to copy-paste this list into your own Google Sheets or Excel spreadsheet for list sortability.

Project Lead

  • Nicholas Dulin, MD (EM Resident, Department of Emergency Medicine, Einstein Medical Center; Captain, Medical Corps, United States Air Force)

Faculty Raters

  1. Claire Abramoff, MD (Assistant Residency Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Einstein Medical Center)
  2. Layla Abubshait, MD (Associate Residency Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Einstein Medical Center Montgomery)
  3. Jacqueline Dash, MS, DO (Core Faculty, Department of Emergency Medicine, Einstein Medical Center)
  4. Joseph Herres, DO (Research Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Einstein Medical Center)
  5. Jessica Parsons, MD (Associate Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Einstein Medical Center)
  6. Anthony Sielicki, MD (Assistant Program Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Einstein Medical Center)
  7. Steven J. Walsh, MD (Medical Toxicology Faculty, Einstein Medical Center)

Reference

  1. Worster A, Kulasegaram K, Carpenter C, et al. Consensus conference follow-up: inter-rater reliability assessment of the Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM) rater scale, a medical literature rating tool for emergency physicians. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(11):1193-1200. [PubMed]

How I Educate Series: Christina Shenvi, MD

Christina ShenviThis week’s How I Educate post features Dr. Christina Shenvi, the Director of the Office of Academic Excellence and former Associate Residency Director at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Dr. Shevani spends approximately 80% of her shifts with learners, including emergency medicine residents, off-service residents, and medical students. She describes her practice environment as tertiary care academic center. Below she shares with us her approach to teaching learners on shift.

Name 3 words that describe a teaching shift with you.

Interactive, team-based, and collaborative.

What delivery methods do use when teaching on shift?

Verbal discussions usually with both residents and med students, where we take turns coming up with answers to things, and share ideas or resources. For example, if we are discussing the causes of falls in older adults, we go around in a circle coming up with things that contribute to the fall syndrome in older patients until none of us can think of any more. For questions with fewer options or answers, I will start with the med student and then move up to the intern and PGY3 to develop a progressively more nuanced or thorough discussion.

What learning theory best describes your approach to teaching?

Scaffolding; social constructivism.

What is one thing (if nothing else) that you hope to instill in those you teach?

A lifelong curiosity and love of learning.

How do you balance your flow with on-shift teaching? Does this come at the expense of your documentation?

I look for times when there is either a natural learning opportunity, a lull in activity, or both. If there is an interesting CT or EKG, that is a good learning moment to gather the group and briefly discuss it. If there is a lull in activity, that is a good time to discuss a given topic related to a patient we have taken care of. It sometimes comes at the expense of documentation, but teaching is a priority.

What is your method for reviewing learners’ notes and how do you provide feedback on documentation?

Usually, I review notes on shift if they are available and provide feedback.

Do you feel departmental flow and metrics adversely affect teaching? What is your approach to excelling at both?

We do what we can with what we have. There is a joint mission in academic hospitals: to care for patients *and* to teach. If the pendulum swings too far one way or the other, then one of the missions will suffer. The goal is to keep both in mind and find moments for teaching, while making other tasks, such as documentation, as efficient as possible.

It can be difficult to sit back and let senior learners struggle what is your approach to not taking over prematurely?

I will usually ask: “Let me know if you need a hand or another set of eyes.” If it is a patient safety issue, then I will step in sooner, otherwise, there is usually time to let them try on their own.

Do you start a teaching shift with certain objectives or develop them as a shift unfolds?

I will usually ask the residents or students what they want to work on that day, or what they would like feedback on. By honing in on their goals, I can pay more attention to the area that they are working on, whether it is ultrasound, EKG interpretation, department flow, communication, etc. That also focuses their attention on the area, so they can work on it.

Do you typically see patients before or after they are presented to you?

After – this allows the learner the chance to gather the information first and present it so that they are the primary caregiver.

How do you boost morale amongst learners on shift?

Staying positive myself is the first goal. Focusing our energy on what we can control vs what is outside of our control is key as well.

How do you provide learners feedback?

Verbal feedback during or at the end of the shift is often the most effective because it can lead to more reflection and discussion. I also provide written feedback online after the shift.

What tips would you give a resident or student to excel on their shift?

Let your attending know what you want to work on and get feedback on. This will help them give you better quality feedback at the end of the shift, rather than “good job” or “read more”. Take ownership of your own learning, making a reading or study schedule for yourself. Pick your favorite resources and podcasts, and make regular time to use them.

Are there any resources you use regularly with learners to educate during a shift?

I often use LITFL and other online resources to show examples of EKGs, procedures, or images.

What are your three favorite topics to teach during a shift?

My fellowship training is in geriatric EM, so I enjoy teaching specifically on geriatric syndromes and falls, ACS in older adults, as well as on EKGs.

What techniques do you employ when teaching on shift?

Discussion, Q&A, elaboration (ie. taking a given case or situation and expanding to other related cases to discuss and expand the learning opportunities).

What is your favorite book or article on teaching?

Books: Make it Stick

Who are three other educators you’d like to answer these questions?

Sara Dimeo; Megan Osborne; Guy Carmelli
How I Educate Series logo

Read other How I Educate posts for more tips on how to approach on-shift teaching.

EM Match Advice 39: Mailbag Q&A as a Mid-Interview Season Check-In

The holiday season is soon ending, but the residency interview season is only at the half-way point. Based on your recently submitted questions, you are encountering unforeseen dilemmas about navigating the interview and post-interview season. Dr. Sara Krzyzaniak (EM program director at Stanford) hosts this quick Mailbag Q&A episode with Dr. Michelle Lin (ALiEM Founder/UCSF) and featuring the ever-wise Dr. Matt Pirotte (EM program director at Vanderbilt). We discuss the nuances around:

  • Preference signaling
  • Writing letters or emails of interest
  • Meaningfully connecting with busy program directors

We also answer the perennial question of “Really, how important IS the interview in my overall application?”

Thank you to EM program directors from Wisconsin, Northwestern, Denver, University of Virginia, University of Massachusetts, St. Johns Riverside, Loyola, St Joseph’s Regional Medical Center, Mount Sinai-Elmhurst, Maimonides, Brookdale, University of Chicago, and Hackensack, who also contributed their insights and answers to your questions.

Match Advice Podcast 39: Mailbag Q&A

 

Reference

Jewell C, David T, Kraut A, Hess J, Westergaard M, Schnapp BH. Post-interview Thank-you Communications Influence Both Applicant and Residency Program Rank Lists in Emergency Medicine. West J Emerg Med. 2019;21(1):96-101. 2019 Dec 9. doi:10.5811/westjem.2019.10.44031. [Open access link]

Read and Listen to the Other EM Match Advice Episodes

Blog posts: https://www.aliem.com/em-match-advice-series/

 

 

By |2022-12-29T22:55:52-08:00Dec 30, 2022|EM Match Advice|

How I Educate Series: Mark Ramzy, DO

This week’s How I Educate post features Dr. Mark Ramzy, an EM attending and Intensivist at RWJBH Community Medical Center in New Jersey. Dr. Ramzy spends approximately 90% of his shifts with learners which include emergency medicine residents, internal medicine residents, and medical students. He describes his practice environment as a split time between the ED and ICU. ED time includes a scanning shift as part of his ultrasound faculty requirements and his ICU time is split across several different units including a MICU, SICU, and CTICU. Below he shares with us his approach to teaching learners on shift.

Name 3 words that describe a teaching shift with you.

Dynamic, Accountability, and Targeted.

What delivery methods do use when teaching on shift?

Drawing on paper/whiteboards and infographics.

What learning theory best describes your approach to teaching?

Toss up between Constructivism vs Connectivism and using Andragogy with a focus on Adult Learning.

What is one thing (if nothing else) that you hope to instill in those you teach?

To trust but verify and not be afraid to question everything.

How do you balance your flow with on-shift teaching? Does this come at the expense of your documentation?

This heavily depends on where I’m working and how the day is going. If in the most critical zone/pod of the emergency department then the teaching is done in real-time with emphasis, repetition, and reinforcement as we go. The content/material is then reviewed at a later time when safe for both the patient at the learner. This typically does not come at the cost of documentation because we have scribes in the emergency department who really help with this.

When in the ICU, many small learning pearls are discussed during rounds. Assuming procedures, consultant discussions, and family meetings are completed and time allows, the afternoon is then reserved for most specific topics that the learners have expressed interest in knowing more about

What is your method for reviewing learners’ notes and how do you provide feedback on documentation?

I review learners’ notes after a shift and take notes myself on very specific items to discuss with them in more detail either via email/text or in person if we are working together within 48 hours. I have this cutoff because that patient (and note) is still fresh in their mind, thus allowing the feedback to stay SMART=Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Relevant, and Timely.

Do you feel departmental flow and metrics adversely affect teaching? What is your approach to excelling at both?

Departmental flow and metrics definitely adversely affect teaching. There has been a greater push across many healthcare systems to “see more patients” or to really prioritize patient satisfaction despite this not necessarily leading to better outcomes. As a result, the teacher and learner are directly impacted. My approach to this starts with a set expectation and in-depth discussion before the shift starts. If the waiting room is packed and there are sick patients that continue to come in, I try my best to have a talk with my learners about the importance of self-driven learning, asking for help, and utilizing resources around them. We set the expectation that the teaching will primarily be “on the go” and to have them write down topics or content that they would like to discuss further when at weekly conference or any other time off a shift. No matter how busy a shift is, learning can always happen. It doesn’t always have to take the form of ventilator settings to reduce AutoPEEP but can look like interprofessional communication, engaging with a family to deliver unfortunate news, or even electronic medical record hacks to work more efficiently.

It can be difficult to sit back and let senior learners struggle what is your approach to not taking over prematurely?

Patience not patients. I talk with my learners thoroughly about their treatment plans and we try to play out what will happen if they carry out wrong/incorrect therapies (without actually doing them of course). This way they can get an expectation of what would happen without causing harm to the patient. When it comes to procedures, I set up or have my own gown/gloves readily nearby. I jump in under three conditions: When the learner asks for help, if they are about to do something that could be detrimental to the patient without knowing or I gage that a complication/failure to complete a procedure will occur (ie. an already difficult airway, failed cannulation on limited vessel access, etc).

Do you start a teaching shift with certain objectives or develop them as a shift unfolds?

I tend to start a shift with certain objectives and explicitly ask the learner, what they would like to work on. I add to it if I’ve worked with them before and observed specific things they could improve. Additionally, we end every shift giving feedback and so we’ll try to work on those same things on the next shift if there’s an area for improvement.

Do you typically see patients before or after they are presented to you?

A mix of both, most of the time I see patients before they are presented to me.

How do you boost morale amongst learners on shift?

Humor and stories from my own experience that were teachable moments.

How do you provide learners feedback?

Also a mix of both. Time permitting, I tend to provide learners with verbal feedback. I then try to build upon that each time we work together. This all then gets incorporated into their written formal residency evaluation feedback.

What tips would you give a resident or student to excel on their shift?

Every moment is a teachable moment. Find the pearl you can take away from every patient encounter, colleague interaction, or conversation. Everything is about perspective and our failure to empathically see other viewpoints is what leads to conflict. Lastly, the best learning you can do is that which pushes you outside of your comfort zone. Learning isn’t easy, it takes time and hard work. It’s a long-term investment in yourself.

Are there any resources you use regularly with learners to educate during a shift?

I frequently reference the EMRA pocket books (digitally or hardcopy). I share many REBEL EM articles and infographics that I’ve personally made so the learner can pay attention to our discussion and then walk away with a summary of it on their phone. Also, Amal Mattu’s ECG weekly is often shared quite a bit.

What are your three favorite topics to teach during a shift?

Ventilator basics and management, pharmacology (usually sedatives), and creating differentials based on data (especially for altered mental status).

What techniques do you employ when teaching on shift?

Creating an optimal learning environment (ie. Psychological safety), spaced repetition and critically challenging learners.

What is your favorite book or article on teaching?

Book: Mindset by Carol Dweck

Article: 12 Tips for Teaching in the ICU

Who are three other educators you’d like to answer these questions?

Anand Swaminathan, Christopher Colbert and Marco Propersi.

How I Educate Series logo

Read other How I Educate posts for more tips on how to approach on-shift teaching.

By |2022-11-22T09:18:50-08:00Dec 21, 2022|How I Educate, Medical Education|

Free Comprehensive Curriculum: Climate Change and Emergency Medicine

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a few of us interested in climate change science met through the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM), and our group slowly expanded with the virtual world. We discussed the ever-growing number of climate publications and scholarship opportunities available. Some of us did research, education, or policy work, and all of us practiced clinically.

Negative climate-related impacts that we see in the Emergency Department

We discussed how climate-related impacts negatively affected our patients, and brainstormed how we could tackle the problem now. For us in Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Colorado, and California, the climate crisis was pathology and interrupted treatment regimens, but also an opportunity to transform current care systems. At all of our hospitals, patients were brought in by ambulance with empty inhalers and non-functioning medical devices after losing electrical power. Monitors beeped from abnormal vital signs of patients impacted by extreme heat, inland and coastal flooding, or wildfires. We recognized the dangers related to place of residence and structural drivers that exacerbated existing health disparities. We agreed that open access education was the next step to action and striving for justice across our nation together.

How to start your climate change learning and advocacy journey?

More and more colleagues asked us where they could begin their own climate and emergency medicine journeys. We used our varied local and global experiences to curate content that could be used for journal clubs, medical simulation, quality improvement projects, grant applications, and other educational tracks or electives. Our goal was to provide a starting place for individuals who may not have dedicated faculty at their institutions.

Get caught up: Comprehensive 10-module curriculum

Climate change and emergency medicine 10-module curriclum

We are proud to announce a comprehensive 10-module curriculum on Climate Change and Emergency Medicine (EM) worth 56 hours of ALiEMU learning credits. Each module encompasses a broad range of reading materials and is followed by a brief quiz on ALiEMU. All of this is available for free. Get learning now.

Be a climate changemaker

We hope the material reminds all of us of what actions are needed yet: authentic partnerships, clear communication of the robust evidence that we know, inclusivity, and leadership. Like emergency medicine, climate change and health work is truly life-long learning. Yet, knowledge is only as good as its use. We look forward to years of innovative solutions that move beyond dialogue and meaningfully address some of the greatest barriers to well-being for our patients and global community.

climate change and EM ALiEMU mega badge climate changer

By |2022-12-13T14:27:20-08:00Dec 14, 2022|ALiEMU, Environmental, Medical Education|

IDEA Series: LUDO game to teach residents about urogenital diseases

The Problem: Urogenital diseases are commonly encountered in the emergency department [1]. Both the WHO and CDC recommend early identification and timely management of such diseases, to prevent morbidity and mortality [2, 3]. Additionally, the sensitive nature of this topic as well as cultural factors can limit the exposure and bedside teaching by emergency physicians (EPs). Novel learning methods are needed to prepare EPs to manage urogenital diseases effectively and efficiently.

The Innovation

The Learning Urogenital Diseases in Oddity (LUDO) gamification-based, timed activity teaches and assesses clinical practice essentials in the management of urogenital diseases among emergency medicine (EM) residents. This acronym plays off of the age-old game enjoyed across generations in Pakistan, also called Ludo. Adopting this popular game format with EM education enhances learning, facilitating the quick digestion of factoids [4]. The format is simple, adaptable, and can be used to teach topics in an engaging way to any learner group.

The Learners

Emergency medicine residents of all class years

IDEA LUDO game team color hats

Figure 1: LUDO game with team colors, designated by hats. Team red is listening to the question on data interpretation.

Group Size

LUDO requires a total of 3 facilitators for 4 teams, each marked with colors as per the LUDO board (green, red, blue, and yellow).

The 3 facilitator roles:

  1. One handles the laptop
  2. One marks the number of times each group has sought additional resources (limited to 5) on the whiteboard
  3. One serves as an assessor, who monitors the group whose turn it is in the game, as the throw the dice and move their color piece once they answer the question correctly.

Equipment

Figure 2: Traditional Ludo board with desk bell

Our activity utilizes simple, cheap, and readily available materials, including the following:

  • LUDO board: A square-shaped, strategy board game for 2-4 players [Ludo game on Amazon] with a pattern on it in the shape of a cross. In this game, the players race their tokens from start to finish according to the rolls of a single die.
  • LED stopwatch: An LED stopwatch was placed on the side of the projector screen. A 1-minute timer was started after the question was read to the team by the facilitator at the laptop and was reset before the next team’s turn.
  • Laptop and projector: A laptop and projector were utilized to display PowerPoint slides as a part of the activity. For example, participants had to view images, true/false questions, multiple choice questions, fill-in-the-blank questions, and rapid-fire questions on the slides. These questions prompted them to identify different aspects of urogenital diseases, as well as differentiate images of genital ulcers that patients may present at urgent care clinics or emergency departments.
  • Colored caps: Four different colored hats, matching the game pieces, were distributed to each person to designate which team they were on.
  • Desk bell: A desk bell could be rung by the team member in the “hot seat” if they wanted to answer the question differently from their team’s consensus answer.

Description of the Innovation

LUDO is a strategy board game for 2-4 players, in which teams race their 4 tokens from start to finish according to single-die rolls. A video description of the traditional Ludo game rules is below. This IDEA innovation mirrored these rules with slight modifications and took place over a 2-hour period.

Before the start of the activity, the activity director provided an introduction regarding the rules and regulations of the program that were also shared through email and WhatsApp a week before the activity.

In our LUDO variation, we assigned 4 team captains to take the “hot seats”, who were responsible for rolling the dice and had the final say in answering their team’s questions. To begin moving their tokens out of the home base circle, they must roll a 6, as in the actual game. After this, they can only move forward if they can answer the pre-prepared questions assigned to each side of the die. If they cannot answer the question, they stay where they are, and the turn proceeds to the next team. For each question, the captain has a minute to answer the question after consulting their team. An LED digital clock adjacent to the projector screen allows all participants to see the remaining time. If the captain desires to answer the question differently than the team’s consensus answer, he or she must ring the desk bell and then provide the alternative answer.

IDEA series LUDO game token movement

Figure 3: Ludo game token path – this example shows movement of the blue token

‘Getting their token home’ is the main objective of the game, but that is only part of the final evaluation to decide who is the winner. Other vital skills the assessor observes include teamwork, time management, the use of outside resources (i.e., books or the internet), and strategy. For example, there may be times when it is advantageous to answer a question wrong to increase one’s chances of landing on the other team’s token. This would send the other team’s token back to their starting position and force them to restart their travels around the board!

Each team has an option to seek additional resources to answer the question including use of our core textbook of emergency medicine or utilizing their mobile phones to access internet resources. Outside resource usage is limited 5 times per team, as tracked by a facilitator.

idea series LUDO team strategy

Figure 4: Yellow team captain joyfully removing a red team’s token piece after answer the question correctly

During the activity, the assessor facilitator judged each team’s performance through a questionnaire with Likert scales measuring the following:

  1. Knowledge of urogenital diseases
  2. Leadership skills of the team captain
  3. Problem-solving
  4. Communication among the team members
  5. Time management

At the end of the activity, each team completed an evaluation form to provide feedback about the activity to the organizers. Participants were also given timely feedback by facilitators immediately following the activity during a debriefing session, where the activity director identified gaps in knowledge and skills and provided suggestions for how to translate lessons learned to future clinical practice.

Downloadable forms:

Lessons Learned

  • The activity allowed the faculty to assess core EM skills in addition to medical knowledge, such as communication, collaboration, leadership, and problem solving. EM residents also practiced navigating team dynamics and working in a group within a safe learning space promoting collegiality among junior and senior residents.
  • The activity utilizes a popular game as a mode of introducing engagement and interest among residents and facilitates learning on a topic that does not tend to generate significant interest on its own.
  • 360-feedback was obtained:
    1. Faculty assessed learning outcomes via a Likert scale for resident feedback.
    2. Residents participated in mini-interviews at completion of the activity for educator feedback.
    3. The LUDO game’s activity and learning outcomes were assessed through a questionnaire, which was piloted prior to use during the game. The validation of the assessment tool is in process. The assessment form is available upon request by contacting Dr. Shahan.
  • The LUDO activity was well received by the EM residents, who requested to repeat the same format for other modules as well. Participants shared their feedback that this activity offers them a unique educational experience with a team-based approach.
  • Game dynamics can be altered by adjusting the complexity of the case and related questions, but any adjustments should align with the intended learning outcome. To conform to the principles of gamification, it is important that the core principles of the game should not be altered much.

Theory behind the innovation

This activity incorporated gamification and competition-based learning theory to create a positive, impactful educational experience for learners. Teaming participants in small groups facilitates collaboration and development of new knowledge through a social constructivist approach.

IDEA LUDO game

Figure 5: Happy faces at the completion of LUDO (left) and the winning group – Team Green (right)

References

By |2023-10-23T21:50:48-07:00Dec 9, 2022|IDEA series|
Go to Top