Cocaine for Epistaxis: What was old is new again

cocaine for epistaxis

Droperidol is back! Routine use of calcium for cardiac arrest is out? TPA is… well, we won’t go there. The landscape of medicine is continuously being reshaped. New research may question the effectiveness of an existing medication or promote the arrival of a novel treatment. Once beloved medications sit dust-laden in the back of a hospital pharmacy. But sometimes, just sometimes, an old medicine arises from that dust. Phenobarbital for alcohol withdrawal comes to mind.

Could cocaine hydrochloride be one of those medications to be resurrected?

Cocaine is effective in the treatment of epistaxis. Epistaxis is an exceedingly common complaint, accounting for approximately one in 200 emergency department (ED) visits in the United States [1, 2]. If you ask any seasoned emergency physician their ideal approach to epistaxis management, chances are high that it used to include cocaine. They will exclaim how superior it was to anything used today and claim, “Not only did it vasoconstrict, but it anesthetized, as well!” If this is the case, why is cocaine hydrochloride no longer used?

This post will chronicle cocaine’s fascinating yet troubled history in medicine and expose you to another tool for your arsenal in the ED management of epistaxis.

History

The coca plant, native to South America, Mexico, Indonesia, and the West Indies, derives its name from the Aymaran word Khoka meaning “the tree” [3]. Coca leaves contain approximately 0.25 to 0.9% cocaine. Their use medicinally dates as far back as 1000 BC by the indigenous people of South America. The leaves were chewed for energy supplementation and altitude sickness relief. During the Incan Empire of the 13th to 16th century, the leaves were revered as sacred and served as a panacea or cure-all. Coca was used to aid in digestion, pain relief, mitigation of hunger, wound healing, and even as a local anesthetic for invasive procedures, such as cranial trephination [3, 4].

It was not until the mid-1800s that cocaine’s journey began in Europe with the German chemist, Albert Nieman. Neiman isolated the alkaloid cocaine from the coca leaf and noted its numbing properties when placed on the tongue [5]. Its anesthetic and vasoconstricting properties were soon recognized by Austrian Professor C.D. Schroff and Peruvian physician, Dr. Thomas Mareno y Maiz [4]. Its popularity in medicine, however, had yet to catch on [4–6].

1884 marked a pivotal year for cocaine use in medicine. Austrian ophthalmologist, Dr. Carl Koller, introduced cocaine as a local anesthetic for cataract and other eye surgeries, which was a groundbreaking advancement. He additionally suggested its use for additional procedures of the nose, pharynx, and larynx [4, 5, 7]. Simultaneously, Sigmund Freud, the famed Austrian neurologist, became fascinated with cocaine’s various applications and wrote Uber Coca, the first of his 5 papers on the subject. He touted it as a “magical substance” without addictive properties. Ironically – and unfortunately – Freud later realized his misjudgment and spent years grappling with cocaine addiction [4, 5, 7].

Cocaine’s use as a local and regional anesthetic spread widely across Europe and to America from there. Influential American surgeons like Dr. William Halstead, a founder of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and his student, Dr. James Corning, further advanced its clinical applications by using cocaine as the first agent for regional nerve blocks and spinal anesthesia [8]. Like Freud, Dr. Halsted became addicted to cocaine and later morphine, which he used to wean his cocaine addiction.

In the early 1900s the medical use of cocaine declined due to increased reports of side effects, the development of safer alternatives such as procaine, and strict regulatory measures such as the 1914 Harrison Narcotics Tax Act [9].

Today’s Use in Medicine

Most of today’s medical use of cocaine is by the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) community. In fact, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery has had a position statement on cocaine since 1886 that reads [10]:

The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery considers cocaine to be a valuable anesthetic and vasoconstricting agent when used as part of the treatment of a patient by a physician. No other single drug combines the anesthetic and vasoconstricting properties of cocaine.

FDA Approval

Cocaine hydrochloride is FDA-approved for local anesthesia for adult nasal procedures. Though not FDA-approved, it is also commonly used by ENT physicians as a hemostatic agent to prevent post-procedure bleeding and as a decongestant to promote a clearer view of the nasal passageways during surgery [11–14]. In the ED, it has been used off-label to treat epistaxis [11, 13, 15, 16] and as an anesthetic and analgesic before fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation [8].

Mechanism of Action

Cocaine is an alkaloid ester with weak basic properties. The addition of hydrochloride salt forms cocaine hydrochloride. In this form, cocaine is soluble in aqueous solution and can be used for ENT procedures. Its anesthetic properties occur via blockage of voltage-gated sodium channels. Vasoconstriction and hemostasis occur due to inhibition of catecholamine reuptake, including norepinephrine [9, 11].

Pharmacokinetics

  • Intranasal absorption: 4-33% [17–19]
  • Onset: 2-5 minutes [8]
  • Duration: 30-45 minutes [8]

Preparations

Cocaine hydrochloride is a clear, green solution. It comes in a single-unit bottle with concentrations ranging from 4-10%. Only the 4% solution is currently recommended as it has similar efficacy to higher concentrations with fewer side effects [11, 22]. The 10% solution should be avoided as it has been associated with toxicity and adverse events [8, 17, 20, 23]. Typically the 4% solution is dispensed in 1 mL or 4 mL single-use bottles.

Efficacy

There is limited research available on the use of intranasal cocaine in the ED for epistaxis management, or any other condition. Studies from the ENT literature have shown that cocaine has similar efficacy to most vasoconstrictors including epinephrine and phenylephrine for preventing bleeding after intranasal procedures [26–30]. The literature is mixed on oxymetazoline (Afrin) in epistaxis with some studies showing it may have superior efficacy in preventing post-procedure epistaxis [31, 32]. However, oxymetazoline lacks any anesthetic properties.

Safety

Concerns about cocaine hydrochloride’s intranasal use primarily revolve around its potential for systemic cardiovascular toxicity. Historical case reports of varying quality have documented significant adverse events including myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac arrhythmias following intranasal use during ENT procedures and epistaxis management [21, 33, 34]. A dive into these reports, however, shows that a concentration and dose over the accepted 4% concentration and 200 mg maximum dose was frequently used in these cases. Many confounders also existed, such as a history of cardiac disease and concomitant medication administration (including general anesthesia) [34, 35]. There have been many contemporary studies comparing cocaine to other vasoconstricting/anesthetic agents in the ENT literature. In these studies, cocaine has not been shown to cause serious adverse CNS or cardiac events including MI, dangerous arrhythmias, or death [28, 32, 36–41].

It is important to note that most of the randomized control studies excluded patients with cardiac disease. It is therefore recommended to avoid the use of cocaine in patients with a history of MI, CAD, congenital heart disease, or uncontrolled hypertension [18, 34]. Cocaine should also be avoided in patients on beta-blocker therapy, from limited studies demonstrating increased coronary vasoconstriction with concomitant administration [20, 42].

Side Effects

The most common side effects are mild blood pressure elevation, mild tachycardia, non-emergent headache, and anxiety [18, 43]. Although rare, signs to watch for that could indicate severe CNS or cardiovascular toxicity include: agitation, seizure activity, hyperthermia, significant hypertension, significant tachycardia or arrhythmias, chest pain, and MI [25, 34].

It is recommended that patients receiving intranasal cocaine should have continuous cardiac monitoring and frequent vital sign checks, assessing for hypertension and tachycardia [21].

Contraindications [11, 24, 25]

Absolute

  • History of allergy to cocaine or substitutes of topical solution

Relative

  • History of cardiovascular disease (uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, MI, coronary artery disease, congestive heart disease, congenital heart disease): Increased risk of cardiac adverse event
  • Seizure/epilepsy history: May decrease seizure threshold
  • Active asthma exacerbation: May cause bronchoconstriction
  • Drug interactions:
    • Beta-blockers: May lead to hypertensive crisis through unopposed alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction
    • Lidocaine/category 1A & 1C antiarrhythmics: Concurrent sodium channel blockade
    • Epinephrine or phenylephrine: Historical reports of MI and ventricular arrhythmia
    • Succinylcholine: Co-metabolism by plasma cholinesterase may lead to increased toxicity
    • Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): Increased risk of seizures
    • Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs): Prevent breakdown of catecholamines and can lead to toxicity
    • Disulfiram: Increases plasma cocaine and could lead to toxicity

Special Populations

  1. Pregnancy: Category C (may cause fetal harm). Avoid use during pregnancy [24, 25].
  2. Lactation: Avoid use during lactation [25].
  3. Pediatric: Not well studied

Barriers to Use

  1. Regulations
    • Schedule II drug (high potential for abuse with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence)
    • Requires storage in a locked cabinet and maintenance of separate written records of use
  2. Time to treatment: May take longer to obtain from the pharmacy compared to alternatives, given storage considerations and whether dispensed from the hospital (rather than ED) pharmacy
  3. Drug testing: Discuss with patients before use that cocaine may be detected up to 1 week in blood and even longer in urine [25].

Applying Cocaine in Epistaxis (24, 25)

  1. You will need at least 80 mg of 4% cocaine hydrochloride.
    • If your hospital stocks the 1 mL bottle of 40 mg/mL cocaine hydrochloride, you should obtain 2 vials (80 mg total). Use 2 separate pledgets, immersing each one in its own bottle.
    • Alternatively, if your hospital stocks the 160 mg/4 mL solution, soak 4 pledgets in the entire 4 mL solution.
    • Each pledget will absorb approximately 1 mL of the 4% solution.
  2. Once fully adsorbed, place 1-2 pledgets in the nasal cavity with epistaxis, positioned against the septum.
  3. Leave the pledgets in place for up to 20 minutes.
  4. Assess for hemostasis.
  5. If needed, you can use a maximum of 2 additional pledgets, if epistaxis does not resolve. The maximum dose should be the lower dose of 200 mg or 2 mg/kg.

Proposed ED Epistaxis Algorithm [16, 44]

Takeaways

  1. In the right patient, cocaine may have a place in the management of epistaxis. Avoid in patients with cardiovascular disease.
  2. Cocaine is the only single agent that both vasoconstricts and anesthetizes.
  3. Insert 1-2 pledgets soaked each with 40 mg of cocaine hydrochloride into the affected nare for 20 minutes.
  4. The maximum dose is 2 mg/kg or 200 mg, whichever is lower.

  1. Newton E, Lasso A, Petrcich W, Kilty SJ. An outcomes analysis of anterior epistaxis management in the emergency department. J Otolaryngol – Head Neck Surg J Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Chir Cervico-Faciale. 2016;45:24. doi:10.1186/s40463-016-0138-2. PMID: 27066834
  2. Pallin DJ, Chng YM, McKay MP, Emond JA, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA. Epidemiology of epistaxis in US emergency departments, 1992 to 2001. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(1):77-81. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.014. PMID: 15988431
  3. Biondich AS, Joslin JD. Coca: The History and Medical Significance of an Ancient Andean Tradition. Emerg Med Int. 2016;2016:4048764. doi:10.1155/2016/4048764. PMID: 27144028
  4. Brain PF, Coward GA. A review of the history, actions, and legitimate uses of cocaine. J Subst Abuse. 1989;1(4):431-451. PMID: 2485453
  5. Redman M. Cocaine: What is the Crack? A Brief History of the Use of Cocaine as an Anesthetic. Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2011;1(2):95-97. doi:10.5812/kowsar.22287523.189. PMID: 25729664
  6. Grzybowski A. [The history of cocaine in medicine and its importance to the discovery of the different forms of anaesthesia]. Klin Oczna. 2007;109(1-3):101-105. PMID: 17687926
  7. Cocaine – Definition, Crack & Plant. HISTORY. Published August 21, 2018. Accessed January 3, 2024.
  8. Roberts JR, Custalow CB, Thomsen TW, eds. Roberts and Hedges’ Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine. Seventh edition. Elsevier; 2019.
  9. Goldstein RA, DesLauriers C, Burda A, Johnson-Arbor K. Cocaine: history, social implications, and toxicity: a review. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2009;26(1):10-17. doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2008.12.001. PMID: 19292024
  10. American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Committee. Position Statement: Medical Use of Cocaine. Published online July 31, 2014. Accessed January 3, 2024.
  11. Lutfallah SC, Brown E, Spillers NJ, et al. Topical Cocaine Hydrochloride Nasal Solution: Anesthetic and Surgical Considerations. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e42804. doi:10.7759/cureus.42804. PMID: 37664274
  12. De R, Uppal HS, Shehab ZP, Hilger AW, Wilson PS, Courteney-Harris R. Current practices of cocaine administration by UK otorhinolaryngologists. J Laryngol Otol. 2003;117(2):109-112. doi:10.1258/002221503762624530. PMID: 12625882
  13. Reid JW, Rotenberg BW, Sowerby LJ. Contemporary decongestant practices of Canadian otolaryngologists for endoscopic sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol – Head Neck Surg J Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Chir Cervico-Faciale. 2019;48(1):15. doi:10.1186/s40463-019-0337-8. PMID: 30885260
  14. Long H, Greller H, Mercurio-Zappala M, Nelson LS, Hoffman RS. Medicinal use of cocaine: a shifting paradigm over 25 years. The Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9):1625-1629. doi:10.1097/00005537-200409000-00022. PMID: 15475793
  15. Seikaly H. Epistaxis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(10):944-951. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp2019344. PMID: 33704939
  16. Tunkel DE, Anne S, Payne SC, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Nosebleed (Epistaxis). Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2020;162(1_suppl):S1-S38. doi:10.1177/0194599819890327. PMID: 31910111
  17. Liao BS, Hilsinger RL, Rasgon BM, Matsuoka K, Adour KK. A preliminary study of cocaine absorption from the nasal mucosa. The Laryngoscope. 1999;109(1):98-102. doi:10.1097/00005537-199901000-00019. PMID: 9917048
  18. Dwyer C, Sowerby L, Rotenberg BW. Is cocaine a safe topical agent for use during endoscopic sinus surgery? The Laryngoscope. 2016;126(8):1721-1723. doi:10.1002/lary.25836. PMID: 27075241
  19. McGrath J, McGrath A, Burdett J, Shokri T, Cohn JE. Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Topical Intranasal Cocaine in Healthy Subjects. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020;34(3):336-341. doi:10.1177/1945892419896241. PMID: 31856588
  20. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Yancy CW, et al. Cocaine-induced coronary-artery vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(23):1557-1562. doi:10.1056/NEJM198912073212301. PMID: 2573838
  21. Richards JR, Laurin EG, Tabish N, Lange RA. Acute Toxicity from Topical Cocaine for Epistaxis: Treatment with Labetalol. J Emerg Med. 2017;52(3):311-313. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.08.006. PMID: 27693072
  22. Lu IC, Hsieh YH, Hsu HT, et al. Comparison of 4% and 6% topical cocaine solutions for reduction of epistaxis induced by nasotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica Off J Taiwan Soc Anesthesiol. 2014;52(1):17-21. doi:10.1016/j.aat.2014.05.001. PMID: 24999214
  23. Gurudevan SV, Nelson MD, Rader F, et al. Cocaine-induced vasoconstriction in the human coronary microcirculation: new evidence from myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation. 2013;128(6):598-604. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002937. PMID: 23812179
  24. Genus Lifesciences Inc. GOPRELTO- cocaine hydrochloride solution Reference ID: 4195367. Published online December 2017.
  25. Micromedex Solutions. Cocaine Hydrochloride. Published online November 30, 2023.
  26. Rector FT, DeNuccio DJ, Alden MA. A comparison of cocaine, oxymetazoline, and saline for nasotracheal intubation. AANA J. 1987;55(1):49-54. PMID: 3551442
  27. Gross JB, Hartigan ML, Schaffer DW. A suitable substitute for 4% cocaine before blind nasotracheal intubation: 3% lidocaine-0.25% phenylephrine nasal spray. Anesth Analg. 1984;63(10):915-918. PMID: 3551442
  28. Valdes CJ, Bogado M, Rammal A, Samaha M, Tewfik MA. Topical cocaine vs adrenaline in endoscopic sinus surgery: a blinded randomized controlled study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(8):646-650. doi:10.1002/alr.21325. PMID: 24678064
  29. Sessler CN, Vitaliti JC, Cooper KR, Jones JR, Powell KD, Pesko LJ. Comparison of 4% lidocaine/0.5% phenylephrine with 5% cocaine: which dilates the nasal passage better? Anesthesiology. 1986;64(2):274-277. doi:10.1097/00000542-198602000-00028. PMID: 3946816
  30. Campbell JP, Campbell CD, Warren DW, Prazma TU, Pillsbury HC. Comparison of the vasoconstrictive and anesthetic effects of intranasally applied cocaine vs. xylometazoline/lidocaine solution. Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 1992;107(5):697-700. doi:10.1177/019459989210700511. PMID: 1279502
  31. Katz RI, Hovagim AR, Finkelstein HS, Grinberg Y, Boccio RV, Poppers PJ. A comparison of cocaine, lidocaine with epinephrine, and oxymetazoline for prevention of epistaxis on nasotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1990;2(1):16-20. doi:10.1016/0952-8180(90)90043-3. PMID: 2310576
  32. Riegle EV, Gunter JB, Lusk RP, Muntz HR, Weiss KL. Comparison of vasoconstrictors for functional endoscopic sinus surgery in children. The Laryngoscope. 1992;102(7):820-823. doi:10.1288/00005537-199207000-00012. PMID: 1614253
  33. Ross GS, Bell J. Myocardial infarction associated with inappropriate use of topical cocaine as treatment for epistaxis. Am J Emerg Med. 1992;10(3):219-222. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(92)90213-H. PMID: 1586432
  34. Higgins TS, Hwang PH, Kingdom TT, Orlandi RR, Stammberger H, Han JK. Systematic review of topical vasoconstrictors in endoscopic sinus surgery. The Laryngoscope. 2011;121(2):422-432. doi:10.1002/lary.21286. PMID: 21271600
  35. Meyers EF. Cocaine toxicity during dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960. 1980;98(5):842-843. doi:10.1001/archopht.1980.01020030836006. PMID: 7378007
  36. MacNeil SD, Rotenberg B, Sowerby L, Allen B, Richard L, Shariff SZ. Medical use of cocaine and perioperative morbidity following sinonasal surgery-A population study. PloS One. 2020;15(7):e0236356. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236356. PMID: 32730351
  37. McGrath J, McGrath A, Burdett J, Shokri T, Cohn JE. Investigation of topical intranasal cocaine for sinonasal procedures: a randomized, phase III clinical trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020;10(8):981-990. doi:10.1002/alr.22561. PMID: 32384578
  38. Pfleiderer AG, Brockbank M. Cocaine and adrenaline: a safe or necessary combination in the nose? A study to determine the effect of adrenaline on the absorption and adverse side effects of cocaine. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1988;13(6):421-426. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2273.1988.tb00315.x. PMID: 2465851
  39. Delilkan AE, Gnanapragasam A. Topical cocaine/adrenaline combination in intransal surgery–is it necessary? Anaesth Intensive Care. 1978;6(4):328-332. doi:10.1177/0310057X7800600406. PMID: 736254
  40. Alhaddad ST, Khanna AK, Mascha EJ, Abdelmalak BB. Phenylephrine as an alternative to cocaine for nasal vasoconstriction before nasal surgery: A randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2013;57(2):163-169. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.111844. PMID: 23825816
  41. Kara CO, Kaftan A, Atalay H, Pinar HS, Oğmen G. Cardiovascular safety of cocaine anaesthesia in the presence of adrenaline during septal surgery. J Otolaryngol. 2001;30(3):145-148. doi:10.2310/7070.2001.20197. PMID: 11771042
  42. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Flores ED, et al. Potentiation of cocaine-induced coronary vasoconstriction by beta-adrenergic blockade. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(12):897-903. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-112-12-897. PMID: 1971166
  43. Drivas EI, Hajiioannou JK, Lachanas VA, Bizaki AJ, Kyrmizakis DE, Bizakis JG. Cocaine versus tetracaine in septoplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121(2):130-133. doi:10.1017/S0022215106002386. PMID: 17274862.
  44. Gottlieb M, Long B. Managing Epistaxis. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;81(2):234-240. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.07.002. PMID: 36117013

SAEM Clinical Images Series: Red Rash on My Legs

milaria

A 23-year-old female with no known past medical history presented with a rash concentrated on her legs, with a few areas on her arms and chest. The rash began the day before presentation when she became overheated while wearing sweatpants in 104°F weather. The rash was mildly pruritic but not painful. She denied any prior reaction to her sweatpants that she has had for several months. She denied any new soap or cosmetic use, prior rash, allergy, or medication use. Her review of systems and past medical history were negative.

Vitals: Normal

Skin: An erythematous papular rash is concentrated and symmetric on her lower extremities. There are a few sparse lesions on her arms, thorax, and abdomen with sparing of the palms, soles, and face. No pustules or vesicles are noted. There is no scale or crust. No other skin lesions are present. The rest of the examination is normal.

Non-contributory

Miliaria, or prickly heat (heat rash).

Miliaria, also known as prickly heat or heat rash, is caused by blocked eccrine sweat glands and ducts. Exposure to heat with sweating causes eccrine sweat to pass into the dermis or epidermis causing a rash. It is common in warm and humid climates during the summer months. It can affect up to 30% of adults living in hot and humid conditions. It may present as vesicles, papules, or pustules depending on the depth of the eccrine gland obstruction. In adults the rash is most likely seen where clothes rub on the skin. Infants and children typically have lesions on the upper trunk, neck, and head. Miliaria is a clinical diagnosis. Treatment involves measures to reduce sweating and exposure to hot and humid conditions. Air conditioning and the reduced humidity of indoor environments are helpful. If significant inflammation is present with pruritis, some improvement can be seen with 0.1% triamcinolone topically, though ointment should be avoided and only cream or lotion applied.

Take-Home Points

  • Miliaria, or prickly heat, is caused by sweating and blocked eccrine sweat glands.
  • Treatment involves retreating to cool, indoor environments.
  • Triamcinolone 0.1% cream or lotion may reduce pruritis.
  • Guerra KC, Toncar A, Krishnamurthy K. Miliaria. 2023 Aug 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. PMID: 30725861.

By |2024-03-26T10:26:51-07:00Apr 1, 2024|Dermatology, SAEM Clinical Images|

SAEM Clinical Images Series: Seeing Double

ophthalmoplegia

A 53-year-old woman with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency department with a 3-day history of double vision on leftward gaze. She initially presented to urgent care with a chief complaint of chest heaviness and concern that her blood pressure was too high, but was sent to the emergency department for further cardiac and neurological evaluation after her urgent care provider noticed abnormal eye movement. She endorsed mild, intermittent headaches associated with diplopia when looking to the left. However, she denied any blurry vision when looking forward. She denied any trauma or falls.

Vitals: Temp 36.7°C; Heart rate 86 beats/min; Respirations 18 breaths/min; BP 150/82 mmHg; O2 Saturation: 100%

General: No acute distress and appears comfortable. She is alert and oriented.

Eyes: Equal, round and reactive pupils and severely limited adduction of the right eye, all other extraocular movements are normal.

Neuro: All other cranial nerves are intact, normal tone in bilateral upper and lower extremities, normal sensation bilaterally to light touch and pinprick except for mildly decreased sensation to pinprick over right ulnar distribution.

CBC, CMP, EKG, and Troponins were normal.

Lipid panel: Cholesterol 241 (H)

CSF: No oligoclonal bands, Protein 197 (H), Albumin 57 (H), IgG 16.3 (H)

Internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO) is defined as the inability to adduct the eye due to a lesion in the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) and can be accompanied by nystagmus in the same eye. The two main causes of internuclear ophthalmoplegia are demyelination of the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) from multiple sclerosis (MS) and ischemic cranial nerve damage from stroke. However, a comprehensive list of causes of INO includes: infarction (ischemic stroke), demyelination (MS), tumor, encephalitis, hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, Chiari malformation, infection (Lyme Disease), and trauma. Usually, MS is seen in younger patients where both eyes are affected whereas strokes occur more often in older patients and only one eye is affected.

The therapeutic approach focuses on treating the underlying cause and hence determining the etiology is of immense importance. A brain MRI should be ordered to evaluate for ischemia and demyelination. Proton density imaging is beneficial in identifying MLF lesions in multiple sclerosis. A lumbar puncture can also help rule out infections. A kappa-free light chain antibody test is a faster and less expensive way to test for multiple sclerosis than looking for oligoclonal bands in the CSF.

Given this patient’s relatively young age and vascular risk factors, stroke is highest on the differential. Her brain MRI showed areas of restricted diffusion in the right dorsal medial pons correlating with her exam. It also showed periventricular and subcortical white matter changes which is a non-specific finding in chronic small vessel ischemic changes vs underlying demyelinating disease. This was followed up with an MRI of her spine that demonstrated C5-6 stenosis with associated cord edema and an additional enhancing C3-4 lesion concerning for demyelinating disease. Her lumbar puncture revealed 3 nucleated cells and a protein of 197 but was deemed a traumatic tap. There were no oligoclonal bands. The initial brain MRI findings favored stroke for which she underwent a stroke work-up and was ultimately discharged on aspirin and atorvastatin for secondary prevention. However, due to concern for demyelinating disease, she was also treated with a 3-day course of IV methylprednisolone. Ultimately, she was discharged and asked to come back for a follow-up for repeat brain imaging and evaluation. A recent study showed that patients with unilateral or bilateral INO who experienced symptomatic diplopia were commonly managed by uniocular occlusion. Another case report showed that a young man who presented with acute INO responded rapidly to treatment with IV alteplase when administered within 2 hours of the onset of symptoms and resolution within 15 minutes. A case series revealed that 1 in 5 patients failed to recover from an INO. Hence, it is critical that a definitive workup is carried out to determine the etiology of the INO.

Take-Home Points

  • Brain MRI including DWI is a useful diagnostic tool for INO.
  • Unilateral INO is more frequently related to ischemic/vascular causes whereas bilateral INO is associated with MS.
  • Kim SS, Lee MH, Ji C. Unilateral Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia Following Minor Head Injury. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2022 Oct 24;18(2):329-334. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2022.18.e64. PMID: 36381451; PMCID: PMC9634317.
  • Mahawish KM, Aravind A. Acute onset internuclear ophthalmoplegia responsive to treatment with intravenous alteplase. N Z Med J. 2020 May 22;133(1515):119-121. PMID: 32438384.
  • Simmons J, Rhodes M. Conservative and Surgical Management of Unilateral and Bilateral Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia (INO)-A Retrospective Analysis. Br Ir Orthopt J. 2022 Nov 7;18(1):152-158. doi: 10.22599/bioj.280. PMID: 36420121; PMCID: PMC9650975.

By |2024-03-16T21:53:50-07:00Mar 22, 2024|Neurology, Ophthalmology, SAEM Clinical Images|

SAEM Clinical Images Series: Purple Finger

bruising

A 30-year-old female with a past medical history of Crohn’s Disease presented to the ED for evaluation of an acutely bruised right 4th finger. She stated she was typing on a computer keyboard approximately 10 minutes prior to presentation and she noticed a sudden popping sensation at the base of her right ring finger. After the popping sensation, she noticed a cool sensation of the finger and numbness to the entire finger. Shortly after that, the finger turned purple, so she came to the Emergency Department for evaluation. She denied pain in the hand and has had no problems moving the finger. She denied trauma to the hand or finger. No other complaints or issues. She noted that she has had this once in the past, which self-resolved on its own in 10 days a few months ago in the same situation.

General: No acute distress

Right hand: Right 4th finger with diffuse ecchymosis across the palmar surface of the finger with swelling, no tenderness, ecchymosis does not extend to the palmar surface of the hand. FROM of all 5 digits at both the DIP and PIP joints. Sensation to the right 4th finger is decreased to light touch.

Left hand: Normal

Extremities: Normal other than the right ring finger

Pulses: Radial pulses 2+ bilaterally

Remainder of the physical exam is normal.

Non-contributory

Achenbach Syndrome, also known as paroxysmal finger hematomas, is a self-limited condition. It typically afflicts middle-aged women and presents as spontaneous subcutaneous bleeding of the palmar surface of the middle and index fingers of the hand. Patients usually present with pain, swelling, tingling, numbness, and ecchymosis. Many report a burning sensation to the finger. Diagnosis is based on presentation and exam. Laboratory testing and imaging do not show pathologic findings in this disorder. There is no known treatment and symptoms usually resolve on their own in a few days, but can last up to months. It has been shown to be recurrent, but without a known cause. Given the dramatic presentation of Achenbach Syndrome, it is important to be aware of this benign process to prevent unnecessary testing and workup, as it is a self-limited process.

Take-Home Points

  • Achenbach Syndrome is a benign, self-limited condition that does not require treatment
  • Relapses may occur.
  • No testing is indicated, but if sent will be normal including laboratory studies and arterial dopplers of the extremity.
  • Ahmed Z, Elmallah A, Elnagar M, Dowdall J, Barry M, Sheehan SJ. Painful Blue Finger-Achenbach’s Syndrome: Two Case Reports. EJVES Short Rep. 2018 Jun 27;40:1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvssr.2018.05.008. PMID: 30094355; PMCID: PMC6070693.
  • van Twist DJL, Hermans W, Mostard GJM. Paroxysmal finger hematoma. Cleve Clin J Med. 2020 Apr;87(4):194. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.87a.19122. PMID: 32238371.

By |2024-04-01T09:11:49-07:00Mar 18, 2024|Orthopedic, SAEM Clinical Images|

SAEM Clinical Images Series: Workout Gone Wrong

hyphema

A 28-year-old male presented to the ED for evaluation of an injury to his right eye. While working out with an exercise band, it snapped back, hitting the patient in the right eye. He experienced blurry vision and excess eye tearing immediately after the incident occurred. The patient also developed gross blood over the front of the eye.

Vitals: Temp 98°F, HR 73, BP (135/77), RR 16, SpO2 99%

HEENT: Gross blood in the anterior portion of the right eye (grade I). The right pupil is dilated with minimal responsiveness to light. Visual Acuity: OD 20/70, OS 20/10, Both 20/10. Pressure: OD (21), OS (16). Decreased visual field on the right when compared to the left. Staining with tetracaine and fluorescein did not reveal any evidence of corneal abrasion or ulceration. Left eye is atraumatic in appearance.

Neurologic: Alert and oriented x3

Non-contributory

A Hyphema is a collection of blood in the anterior chamber of the eye due to the tearing of the iris root vessels.

The most common cause is blunt trauma to the eye. Spontaneous hyphemas can also occur and are often associated with sickle cell disease. It can be caused by ocular surgery and neoplastic disease, as well.

Take-Home Points

  • Hyphemas are an ocular emergency and should prompt immediate consultation with an ophthalmologist.
  • Patients should elevate the head of the bed to 45 degrees since layering of the blood is gravity-dependent.
  • Treatment usually involves the administration of steroidal and cycloplegic ophthalmic drops.
  • Cline, D., Ma, O. J., Meckler, G. D., Stapczynski, J. S., Thomas, S. H., Tintinalli, J. E., & Yealy, D. M. (2020). 241. In Tintinalli’s emergency medicine: A comprehensive study guide. essay, McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Traumatic Hyphema. Wikem. (2020, March 18). Retrieved January 11, 2023, from https://www.wikem.org/wiki/Main_Page

SAEM Clinical Images Series: Not Your Usual Irritated Eye

eye irritation

In July 2022, a 32-year-old male with a past medical history of HIV (on antiretroviral therapy, CD4 390, viral load undetectable) presented to the emergency department with constitutional symptoms and a rash for 4-5 days. His symptoms included malaise, body aches, subjective fevers, a sore throat, tender, swollen neck glands, body rash, and irritation of his left eye. He also noticed fluid-filled vesicles on his face, neck, trunk, and extremities. He denied travel outside the U.S. but reported a recent trip to New Orleans. He denied any new sexual partners or known exposure to individuals with similar symptoms.

Vitals: BP 135/83; Pulse 104; Temp 100.2 °F (37.9 °C); Resp 22; SpO2 99%

Constitutional: Alert, no acute distress

HEENT: 1×1 mm raised lesion to the left medial canthus/caruncle. No appreciated LAD. Oropharynx is clear and moist, and mucous membranes are normal.

Cardiovascular: Tachycardia, regular rhythm, and normal heart sounds.

Pulmonary: Breath sounds normal, unlabored respirations.

Abdominal: Soft. Non-tender.

Skin: Numerous 5-6 mm erythematous macules, bland fluid-filled vesicles, and umbilicated lesions throughout the face, neck, trunk, and extremities.

Complete Blood Count (CBC): WBC: 19.5 10^3/mcL, Hemoglobin: 15.2 gm/dL, Hematocrit: 43.6%, Platelet count: 325 10^3/mcL

Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP): Within normal limits

RPR titer: Reactive, 1:4

Syphilis antibody IgG and IgM: Positive

Orthopoxvirus DNA: Pending

HIV RNA: Pending

The patient has Monkeypox with involvement of the caruncle of the left eye. The patient tested positive for non-variola orthopoxvirus DNA. Ophthalmology was consulted and did not find any other signs of compromise to the eye and recommended treatment with artificial tears. The patient received 14 days of Tpoxx. The patient’s eye lesion and symptoms resolved and he was discharged on hospital day eight.

Ocular lesions are a rare presentation of the monkeypox virus. There is limited literature documenting eye involvement and pictographic examples of its presentation. During the current outbreak, ocular involvement has been used as a criteria for hospital admission. The most commonly seen ophthalmologic lesions include a vesicular rash of the orbital and periorbital skin (25%), focal conjunctiva lesions, blepharitis, and conjunctivitis. Rarely, lesions can process to corneal ulcerations, keratitis, and vision loss. Given the late risk of vision loss in cases of ocular manifestations, clinicians should be aware of the varied presentation of ocular lesions associated with the monkeypox virus.

Take-Home Points

  • While rare, ocular involvement of Monkeypox is associated with vision loss, and should be promptly identified and addressed by a clinician.
  • If there is ocular involvement of primarily cutaneous pathology, a thorough eye exam is indicated in the initial assessment of the patient.
  • Abdelaal A, Serhan HA, Mahmoud MA, Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Sah R. Ophthalmic manifestations of monkeypox virus. Eye (Lond). 2023 Feb;37(3):383-385. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02195-z. Epub 2022 Jul 27. PMID: 35896700; PMCID: PMC9905463.
  • Kumar N, Acharya A, Gendelman HE, Byrareddy SN. The 2022 outbreak and the pathobiology of the monkeypox virus. J Autoimmun. 2022 Jul;131:102855. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2022.102855. Epub 2022 Jun 25. PMID: 35760647; PMCID: PMC9534147.
  • Thornhill, John P., et al. “Monkeypox virus infection in humans across 16 countries—April–June 2022.” N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 25;387(8):679-691. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207323. Epub 2022 Jul 21. PMID: 35866746.

Go to Top