SAEM Clinical Image Series: Surfing Sting

sting

A 38-year-old male presents 8 days after being stung in the left foot while surfing. He reports the sudden onset of sharp pain while walking in the ocean. He was seen initially in the emergency department. The puncture wound on his left foot was anesthetized, explored, and irrigated. No X-ray was obtained, no foreign body was discovered, and he was discharged home.

Two days ago, he noticed worsening heat, itchiness, swelling, and skin changes (red bumps and patches extending from the foot up to the lower calf) in his left foot. His current pain is rated 3/10 and localized to the left foot. The patient is able to walk and bear weight. He has been taking ibuprofen for pain control and is not taking antibiotics. He denies fevers, but reports fatigue and feels more cold than usual.

(more…)

SplintER Series: I Think My Knee Popped?

 

patellar subluxation

13-year-old M presents to the ED with acute left knee pain that occurred about 2 hours prior to arrival while playing football. No direct trauma. Reports two audible “pops” followed by knee instability. Radiograph as pictured (Image 1. Plain film of the left knee. Image courtesy of John Kiel, DO).

 

Patellar subluxation. This patient likely had a spontaneous dislocation and relocation (the two “pops”). There is a very small avulsion fracture noted along the lateral femoral condyle.

  • PEARL: Patellar subluxations and dislocations are most commonly seen in the pediatric population [1].
  • PEARL: Patellar subluxation most frequently occurs in the lateral direction. Most commonly secondary to trauma, however, can also be seen in people with hypermobile joints.

It is very important to complete a full neurovascular exam. As well as performing a thorough musculoskeletal exam, assessing the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), lateral cruciate ligament (LCL), medial cruciate ligament (MCL), and patella. View the ALiEM 2 minute knee examination.

If there is an abnormal neurovascular exam or unstable knee examination, pursue further workup such as a CT scan. As an outpatient, further imaging that can be considered is an MRI knee. See below for images from this case.

Potential complications of patellar subluxations

Image 2. Knee MRI – Sagittal cut showing large knee effusion. Image courtesy of John Kiel, DO.

Potential complications of patellar subluxations

Image 3. Knee MRI – Axial cut showing the osteochondral defect of the patella. Image courtesy of John Kiel, DO.

  • PEARL: In this case, the patient has a large effusion and loose body on the outpatient MRI. The medial constraint of the patella that prevents lateral subluxation, the medial patellofemoral ligament (MFPL), is torn.

This is one of the few times a knee immobilizer is appropriate. However, close follow-up with sports medicine or orthopedics should be stressed as atrophy and contractions can occur if the patient remains in the knee immobilizer for an extended duration. Provide crutches and ask the patient to be non-weight bearing. Anti-inflammatories as needed are appropriate and encourage icing and movement.

  • PEARL: Most common complaints include pain, joint effusion/swelling, lockage, decreased range of motion, joint instability, and/or crepitation [2].

An urgent follow-up is needed with sports medicine or orthopedics for further evaluation [3]. In the case of this patient who already had an MRI, he will typically require chondroplasty of the patella and MFPL reconstruction as an outpatient. Post-operatively, he will undergo standard physical therapy with an emphasis on range of motion and quadriceps strengthening.

  • PEARL: In about 60% of the pediatric population, the zone of the MFPL injury is the predominant site of patellar insertion, which is an indication for surgical reconstruction [4].

 

References

  1. Chotel, F., Knorr, G., Simian, E., Dubrana, F., & Versier, G. Knee osteochondral fractures in skeletally immature patients: French multicenter study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(8). PMID: 22041573
  2. Kramer, D. E., & Pace, J. L. (2012). Acute Traumatic and Sports-Related Osteochondral Injury of the Pediatric Knee. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43(2), 227-236. PMID: 22480471
  3. Griffin, J. W., Gilmore, C. J., & Miller, M. D. (2013). Treatment of a Patellar Chondral Defect Using Juvenile Articular Cartilage Allograft Implantation. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2(4). PMID: 24400181
  4. Dixit, S., & Deu, R. S. Nonoperative Treatment of Patellar Instability. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2017;25(2), 72-77. PMID: 28459749

 

SAEM Clinical Images: Man vs Snow Blower

amputation

A 28-year-old man presents to the emergency department after a snow blower accident while at work. The patient was performing maintenance and he placed his hand into a clogged snow blower while the machine was still on. His hand subsequently got jammed in the snow blower, catching his second and third digits. The patient has an obvious amputation of the right third digit with the stump still connected to the hand via the flexor tendon, which is attached to the distal phalanx. He has pain in the right hand and lack of sensation to the distal phalanx.

(more…)

ALiEM AIR Series | Immunology 2020 Module

Welcome to the AIR Immunology Module! After carefully reviewing all relevant posts from the top 50 sites of the Social Media Index, the ALiEM AIR Team is proud to present the highest quality online content related to immunology in the Emergency Department. 5 blog posts within the past 12 months (as of September 2020) met our standard of online excellence and were curated and approved for residency training by the AIR Series Board. We identified 2 AIR and 3 Honorable Mentions. We recommend programs give 3 hours (about 30 minutes per article) of III credit for this module.

AIR Stamp of Approval and Honorable Mentions

In an effort to truly emphasize the highest quality posts, we have 2 subsets of recommended resources. The AIR stamp of approval is awarded only to posts scoring above a strict scoring cut-off of ≥30 points (out of 35 total), based on our scoring instrument. The other subset is for “Honorable Mention” posts. These posts have been flagged by and agreed upon by AIR Board members as worthwhile, accurate, unbiased, and appropriately referenced despite an average score.

Interested in taking the Immunology quiz for fun or asynchronous (Individualized Interactive Instruction) credit? Please go to the above link. You will need to create a free, 1-time login account.

Highlighted Quality Posts: Immunological Emergencies

SiteArticleAuthorDateLabel
EMCrit: IBCCAngioedemaJosh Farkas, MD1 Aug 2019AIR
EMDocsProlonged Pediatric Fever and Evaluating Patients for Kawasaki Disease, Toxic Shock Syndrome, and Multi-inflammatory Syndrome of ChildrenChance Sullivan, MD, Skyler Lentz, MD, and Joe Ravera, MD3 Aug 2020AIR
EMCrit/PulmCritHow to Use IV Epinephrine for AnaphylaxisJosh Farkas, MD 26 Aug 2019HM
CanadiEMConvalescent Plasma for COVID-19Kevin Shopsowitz, MD7 Jul 2020HM
Taming the SRUAngioedema in the EDMarlena Wosiski-Kuhn, MD10 Aug 2020HM
AIR = Approved Instructional Resource; HM = Honorable Mention

(AIR = Approved Instructional Resource; HM = Honorable Mention)

If you have any questions or comments on the AIR series, or this AIR module, please contact us! More in-depth information regarding the Social Media Index.

Thank you to the Society of Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and the Council of EM Residency Directors (CORD) for jointly sponsoring the AIR Series! We are thrilled to partner with both on shaping the future of medical education.

SAEM Clinical Image Series: An Incidental Finding

nail gun

A middle-aged man presented after a motor vehicle collision with a logging truck at 55 miles per hour with low back pain. A computed tomography scan (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis at an outside facility showed a burst fracture of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). The patient had no other complaints. Given the fracture, additional CT imaging was done and the above finding was discovered.

After the incidental finding was found, the patient reported a nail gun accident three years prior where he thought it had just recoiled and struck him in the lip and nose, causing a lip laceration and a minor bloody nose. The patient was seen in the emergency department. The laceration was repaired, and he was discharged without imaging. The patient denied any significant residual symptoms or personality changes. The patient had no idea that a nail had discharged from the gun and lodged in his face and brain.

(more…)

Ultrasound for the Win! 18M with Acute Shoulder Injury #US4TW

Ultrasound for the win

Welcome to another ultrasound-based case, part of the “Ultrasound For The Win!” (#US4TW) Case Series, where bedside ultrasound changed the management or aided in a diagnosis. In this case, an 18-year-old man presents with acute shoulder pain after an injury.

Learning Objectives

  1. List the differential diagnosis for a patient presenting with shoulder pain.
  2. Discuss the role of the shoulder point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and how to correctly perform the scan using a posterior approach.  
  3. Discuss the prevalence, diagnostic approach, sonographic findings, ED management, and disposition of a shoulder subluxation.
  4. Discuss recent literature regarding shoulder POCUS and its utility and value in the ED, particularly in shoulder dislocations.

Case Presentation

An 18-year-old male with no past medical history presents to the ED with acute-onset left shoulder pain that occurred just prior to arrival. The patient was involved in a physical altercation in which his left arm was pulled. He felt a “pop” followed by pain in the shoulder. The patient reports that his arm was pulled again a second time, further worsening the pain. He complains of persistent limited and painful range of motion (ROM) of the left shoulder. He has no history of prior shoulder dislocations, fractures, or other musculoskeletal injuries.

On physical examination, the patient’s left shoulder has limited active ROM due to pain but is able to perform abduction of more than 90 degrees, and internal and external rotation of the affected joint. There is tenderness to palpation of the anterolateral aspect of the left shoulder but no redness, significant swelling, or any obvious deformities.

Vitals

  • BP 110/65 mmHg
  • HR 85 bpm
  • RR 20 breaths/min
  • SpO2 95% on room air
  • Temp 36.4⁰C

Differential Diagnosis

  • Shoulder dislocation
  • Glenohumeral joint (GHJ) effusion
  • Shoulder subluxation / GHJ instability
  • Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injury
  • Shoulder sprain/strain
  • Proximal humerus fracture
  • Clavicle fracture
  • Scapular fracture
  • Rotator cuff tear
  • Biceps or triceps tendon injuries

Our Clinical Approach

Upon physical examination, there was a low clinical suspicion for shoulder dislocation, given the patient’s decent ROM. The clinical presentation suggested a shoulder sprain versus a partial tear of the rotator cuff muscles versus GHJ instability or subluxation, which may be secondary to above.

While an x-ray would be the usual initial imaging modality of choice in a patient presenting to the ED with a musculoskeletal injury, there can be delays in obtaining imaging depending on patient volumes, staffing, and resources. Given this, a bedside POCUS of the shoulder was performed using a posterior approach in order to quickly rule out a shoulder dislocation and expedite patient care.

ultrasound shoulder external rotation
Figure 1 – The affected left shoulder POCUS in an externally rotated position

ultrasound shoulder internal rotation
Figure 2 – The affected left shoulder POCUS in an internally rotated position, revealing a left shoulder subluxation or partial dislocation of the glenohumeral joint

shoulder subluxation POCUS ultrasound
Figure 3 – Video clip reveals the left humeral head sliding in and out of the glenoid fossa while the patient rotates the joint externally and internally, confirming the diagnosis of shoulder subluxation.

Diagnosis: Shoulder Subluxation

  • Also known as shoulder or glenohumeral joint partial dislocation, or glenohumeral joint instability.
  • Occurs when the humeral head partially slides (or “dislocates”) in and out of place with range of motion at the GHJ. It is usually associated with trauma to the shoulder and injury to the shoulder ligaments. It can also occur in the absence of trauma, in which case it is typically associated with congenital instability of the GHJ.
  • The role of the ED physician involves ruling out a shoulder dislocation, concomitant fractures, or neurovascular injuries. Usually, no reduction attempt is required (unless the diagnosis is not certain and there is concern for an actual dislocation), and the patient can be discharged home with a shoulder sling or immobilizer as well as a plan for analgesia, such as anti-inflammatories.
  • Any patient with shoulder subluxation should be referred to outpatient orthopedic follow up as they will likely need further imaging and evaluation for both non-operative and surgical options for definitive treatment.
Figure 4 – The posterior approach for shoulder POCUS

Shoulder POCUS: The Posterior Approach

  • Position yourself behind the patient with the ultrasound machine positioned in front of the patient.
  • Locate the scapular spine with palpation.
  • Using the curvilinear probe, place the probe on top of the scapular spine in a transverse plane with the probe orientation marker pointing toward to the patient’s left (Fig. 4). Identify the scapular spine as a hyperechoic line with posterior shadowing. Note the deltoid and the infraspinatus muscle above the scapular spine.
  • Slide the probe laterally along the scapular spine, towards the GHJ. You will start to see the glenoid fossa (which may be difficult to visualize in a non-dislocated shoulder) followed by the humeral head, seen as a round hyperechoic structure with posterior shadowing (Fig. 5).
    • To optimize your image, you should position the glenoid fossa and GHJ in the center of the screen. You will see the scapular spine on one half of the screen and the humeral head on the other half. We recommend you adjust the depth for optimal visualization of the GHJ.
    • Remember that if you are scanning the patient’s left shoulder (as in the featured case – Figs. 1, 2), you will see the humeral head on the left side of the screen and the scapular spine on the right side, and vice versa if you are scanning the right shoulder (Figs. 4, 5).
    • With a posterior approach, an anterior dislocation is identified as the humeral head is displaced inferiorly on the screen (i.e. away from the probe) (Fig. 6). A posterior dislocation is identified as the humeral head is displaced towards to the top of the screen (i.e. towards the probe).

Figure 5 – POCUS showing a normal right shoulder with identified structures.

ultrasound anterior shoulder dislocation US4TW
Figure 6 – POCUS showing a right shoulder anterior dislocation

Figure 7 – Clip showing a normal right shoulder being rotated externally and internally

Shoulder POCUS Tips

  1. Have the patient slowly rotate the shoulder internally and externally to more easily identify the humeral head (Fig. 7). This will be especially useful to aid in identifying structures in patients with more musculature and/or a larger body habitus.
  2. If you have any doubt and/or you’re not convinced that the findings are normal or not, scan the unaffected shoulder and compare both sides.
  3. With the same posterior approach mentioned above, you can perform an ultrasound-guided GHJ lidocaine injection. Remember this procedure should be sterile! Prep the skin with chlorhexidine, use sterile gloves, sterile gel, and probe cover. You will likely need a spinal needle to reach the GHJ. Inject 15-20 cc of 1% lidocaine into the GHJ. Performing intra-articular anesthesia has been described as an effective pre-reduction approach for analgesia with no significant difference in successful reduction rates or pain during or post-reduction; fewer adverse effects; and decrease overall ED length of stay [1].
  4. In the case of shoulder dislocations, obtain a post reduction x-ray (particularly if the pre-reduction x-ray was not performed) to evaluate for concomitant fractures and to confirm reduction. However, re-scanning the shoulder immediately post-reduction will not only confirm reduction in real time, but also minimize time delays if the shoulder was not successfully reduced and will need a re-attempt of the reduction. This approach will be of more value when doing procedural sedation, as you can potentially re-attempt the reduction while the patient is still sedated. Procedural sedation in a busy ED is a very time and resource-consuming procedure and doing a post-reduction POCUS is a great way to maximize efficiency in utilization of ED resources.

Shoulder POCUS Literature Review

POCUS is a quick and highly accurate way to diagnose shoulder dislocations and subluxations while minimizing length of stay in the ED.  

  • Secko et al [2] – Study of 65 patients that demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95% CI 87-100%) and 100% (95% CI 87-100%), respectively, for the diagnosis of shoulder dislocations. The “time from triage to diagnosis via POCUS” was a stunning 19 seconds in comparison to 43 minutes of “time from triage to diagnosis via X-ray”. Of note, the images in this study were obtained by ultrasound fellowship trained physicians only.
  • Gottlieb et al [3] – Meta-analysis of 306 dislocations. POCUS was 99.1% sensitive (95% CI 84.9-100%) and 99.9% specific (95% CI 88.9-100%) for the diagnosis.

The sooner you attempt reduction, the better your chances at success!

  • Kanji et al [4] – Time from “injury to 1st reduction attempt” and “ED arrival to 1st reduction attempt” – both were found to be independent predictors of a higher reduction failure rate (OR=1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13; OR=1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.34). Every interval of 10 minutes increased the odds of a failed reduction attempt by 7% and 19%, respectively, for each group.

Disposition and Case Conclusion: Glenohumeral Subluxation

The patient was placed in a shoulder sling and discharged home with instructions to take ibuprofen as needed for pain. He was instructed to rest the shoulder for the next few days and follow up with his primary care physician with consideration of physical therapy for shoulder strengthening exercises. Lastly, he was referred for outpatient orthopedic followup, as he may need further imaging (i.e. shoulder CT scan or MRI) and potential surgical intervention, if the symptoms persist.

Take Home Points

  • Shoulder POCUS is a valuable tool that forms part of the ED physician armamentarium to tackle the diagnosis, ED management, and timely disposition of shoulder injuries.
  • Shoulder subluxation is a musculoskeletal injury that can be reliably assessed with POCUS. The ED management consists of ruling out fractures and dislocations, pain management, shoulder movement restriction with shoulder slings or immobilizers, patient education, and adequate outpatient referral to orthopedics or physical therapy.
  • Recently published literature illustrated the benefits and effectiveness of shoulder POCUS to reliably diagnose shoulder dislocations, assist in GHJ intra-articular joint injections, and confirm reductions in real time.

Edited by Dr. Jeffrey Shih, Ultrasound For The Win (US4TW) Series Editor

  

References

  1. Wakai A, O’Sullivan R, McCabe A. Intra-articular lignocaine versus intravenous analgesia with or without sedation for manual reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(4):CD004919. Published 2011 Apr 13. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004919.pub2. PMID: 21491392
  2. Secko MA, Reardon L, Gottlieb M, et al. Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography to Diagnose Dislocated Shoulders: A Prospective Cohort. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76(2):119-128. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.01.008. PMID: 32111508
  3. Gottlieb M, Holladay D, Peksa GD. Point-of-care ultrasound for the diagnosis of shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(4):757-761. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.024. PMID: 30797607
  4. Kanji A, Atkinson P, Fraser J, Lewis D, Benjamin S. Delays to initial reduction attempt are associated with higher failure rates in anterior shoulder dislocation: a retrospective analysis of factors affecting reduction failure. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(2):130-133. doi:10.1136/emermed-2015-204746. PMID: 26113487

ACMT Toxicology Visual Pearls: Case of a Toxic Tea

teakratom

The plant pictured is used as a tea, powder, or capsule by individuals looking to self-treat pain or opioid use disorder.  Patients may develop nausea, vomiting, hallucinations, or other serious clinical effects after ingestion.  What compound is contained in this plant?

  1. Arecoline from Areca catechu
  2. Kava lactone from Piper methysticum
  3. Mitragynine from Mitragyna speciosa
  4. Salvinorin from Salvia divinorum

Answer

3 – Mitragynine from Mitragyna speciosa also known as Kratom

What is Kratom? [1-6]

  • Kratom is an herbal product that derives from the tree Mitragyna speciosa, native to Southeast Asia, where it has been historically used as a stimulant.
  • Recently it has grown in popularity in western countries for its opioid activity, primarily used to self-treat opioid withdrawal and chronic pain.
  • It is sold in several forms including leaves, powder, capsules, gum, and extract.
  • The active compound, mitragynine, may cause nausea, vomiting, hallucinations, and opioid-like Deaths have been reported.
  • There are currently no FDA-approved uses for kratom and its legal status is evolving, most recently classified by the DEA as a Drug and Chemical of Concern. The FDA continues to warn consumers not to use any products labeled as containing the botanical substance kratom or its psychoactive compounds, mitragynine, and 7-hydroxymitragynine.

What is the clinical presentation of kratom toxicity? [1,3,5,7]

  • Kratom contains over 40 alkaloids, including mitragynine. Mitragynine is primarily a mu-opioid receptor agonist but also has activity at postsynaptic α-2, serotonin, dopamine, adenosine, and additional opioid receptors.
  • Kratom’s neuropsychiatric effects occur rapidly after ingestion and may last 4-6 hours after the exposure.
  • At lower ingestions (approximately 2-6 grams) kratom acts as a stimulant, while larger ingestions predominantly result in sedation and other opioid effects.
  • The dose-dependent effects of kratom are thought to be due to the dual binding of α adrenergic receptors leading to stimulation and μ opioid receptors causing sedation.
  • Gastrointestinal symptoms including nausea, vomiting, and constipation
  • Cardiovascular symptoms such as tachycardia and hypertension
  • Neurologic symptoms including seizures, hallucinations, agitation, psychosis, and coma
  • Respiratory depression can occur
  • Substance use disorder and withdrawal are reported with symptoms similar to other opioids.

How do you manage kratom toxicity? [1, 3]

  • Minor symptoms generally require only supportive care
  • Naloxone can reverse opioid effects
  • Benzodiazepines can be used to treat patients with seizures, tachycardia, hypertension, and agitation.
  • Withdrawal and substance use disorder may be managed similarly to other opioids.

Bedside pearls

  • Kratom use is increasingly popular in the United States, often for self-treatment of chronic pain or opioid use disorder.
  • Kratom acts on many different receptors, including the μ, κ, and δ opioid receptors, which contributes to potential withdrawal symptoms and substance use disorders
  • Toxicity can lead to life-threatening symptoms such as respiratory depression, seizure, and coma
  • Withdrawal presents similarly to opioid withdrawal and should be managed similarly

This post has been peer-reviewed on behalf of ACMT by William Eggleston, Bryan Judge, and Louise Kao

References

  1. Rech MA, Donahey E, Cappiello Dziedzic JM, Oh L, Greenhalgh E. New drugs of abuse. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(2):189-197. doi:10.1002/phar.1522 PMID: 25471045
  2. Stolt AC, Schröder H, Neurath H, et al. Behavioral and neurochemical characterization of kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) extract. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014;231(1):13-25. doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3201-y  PMID: 23846544
  3. Fox LM. Plant- and Animal-Derived Dietary Supplements. In: Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies. Nelson LW Howland MA Lewin NA eds; 11th edition 2019; McGraw Hill,
  4. Boyer EW, Babu KM, Adkins JE, McCurdy CR, Halpern JH. Self-treatment of opioid withdrawal using kratom (Mitragynia speciosa korth). Addiction. 2008;103(6):1048-1050. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02209.x PMID: 18482427
  5. Eggleston W, Stoppacher R, Suen K, Marraffa JM, Nelson LS. Kratom Use and Toxicities in the United States. Pharmacotherapy. 2019;39(7):775-777. doi:10.1002/phar.2280 PMID: 31099038
  6. Department of Justice/Drug Enforcement Administration Drug Fact Sheet:  Kratom.  Available at: https://www.dea.gov/factsheets/kratom, accessed August 24, 2020
  7. Swogger MT, Walsh Z. Kratom use and mental health: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;183:134-140. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.10.012  PMID: 29248691

Go to Top