About Michelle Lin, MD

ALiEM Founder and CEO
Professor and Digital Innovation Lab Director
Department of Emergency Medicine
University of California, San Francisco

Paucis Verbis card: Cervical spine imaging rules

CervicalCollarThere is constant debate on whether to image the cervical spine of blunt trauma patients. Fortunately, there are two clinical decision tools available to help you with your evidence-based practice.

The NEXUS and Canadian C-spine Rules (CCR) are both validated studies which both quote a high sensitivity (over 99%) in detecting clinically significant cervical spine fractures. Both studies primarily used plain films in evaluating their patients.

Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
NEXUS 99.6 12.6
CCR 99.4 45.1

 

NEXUS

National Emergency X-radiography Utilization Study

A patient’s neck can be clinically cleared safely without radiographic imaging if all five low-risk conditions are met:

  1. No posterior midline neck pain or tenderness
  2. No focal neurological deficit
  3. Normal level of alertness
  4. No evidence of intoxication
  5. No clinically apparent, painful distracting injury*

* Defined as “a condition thought by the clinician to be producing pain sufficient to distract the patients from a second (neck) injury. Examples may include, but are not limited to the following:

  1. Long bone fracture,
  2. A visceral injury requiring surgical consultation,
  3. A large laceration, degloving injury, or crush injury,
  4. Large burns, or
  5. Any other injury producing acute functional impairment

Physicians may also classify any injury as distracting if it is thought to have the potential to impair the patient’s ability to appreciate other injuries.”

Canadian C-spine Rules (CCR)

The basic approach in this flow-chart is to (1) make sure that the patient meets the same inclusion criteria as in the CCR study. Then (2) determine if there are high-risk findings. If so, go directly to imaging. (3) If there are no high-risk findings, check to see if the patient qualifies as a low-risk candidate where you might be able to clinically clear the c-spine without imaging. (4) If the patient is neither high or low risk, then the patient is moderate risk and requires imaging. Here’s a flow chart that I made to help you remember:


Go to ALiEM (PV) Cards for more resources.

Note: Many emergency physicians go straight to CT imaging for patients with neck tenderness and moderate/high risk findings. I personally rarely use the CCR algorithm because I can rarely remember all of the criteria. NEXUS is nice because of its simplicity. Where the CCR algorithm IS helpful is in clinical clearance of the low-risk patient with neck pain. I’ve cleared many patients who self-present with a whiplash mechanism (simple rear-end motor vehicle crash) and diffuse neck pain. By NEXUS criteria, you’d have to image them because they have neck tenderness. By CCR criteria, if they can actively rotate their neck 45 degrees left and right, they don’t have a clinically significant c-spine injury. No imaging needed.

By |2021-10-17T09:17:48-07:00Dec 10, 2010|ALiEM Cards, Orthopedic, Trauma|

Article review: Consensus methodologies in qualitative research

Strength in Numbers

What types of methodologies are used to develop a consensus statement? I’m in the midst of helping to write a consensus statement manuscript in education and ran into this great review article. It’s from the British Medical Journal in 1995. 

Basically, there are 2 general types of methodologies:

  • Delphi Process
  • Nominal Group Technique 

(more…)

By |2016-11-11T19:00:18-08:00Dec 6, 2010|Education Articles, Medical Education|

Paucis Verbis card: Dysphagia

DysphagiaDyphagia is a disorder of swallowing. It actually occurs in up to 10% of adults older than 50 years old. How can you determine the most likely causes for dysphagia? The secret is to obtain a thorough history and using the algorithm below, which I find really helpful from a review article in American Family Physician.

How do you read the figure?

  • Determine first if patient has oropharyngeal vs esophageal dysphagia.
  • Determine if mechanical (problem is solid foods only) vs neuromuscular (problem with liquids and solids)is more likely.

Tip:

  • Medications can cause dysphagia from esophageal mucosal injury or reduced lower esophageal sphincter tone.
  • CVA is most common cause of oropharyngeal dysphagia

Workup:

  • Endoscopy
  • Barium swallow
  • Consider esophageal pH probe, manometry

PV Card: Dysphagia


Adapted from [1]
Go to ALiEM (PV) Cards for more resources.

Reference

  1. Spieker M. Evaluating dysphagia. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(12):3639-3648. [PubMed]
By |2021-10-17T09:20:02-07:00Dec 3, 2010|ALiEM Cards, Gastrointestinal|

Trick of the Trade: Laryngospasm notch maneuver

 

 smLacerationLipKetamine1What is the incidence of laryngospasm in pediatric patients receiving ketamine for procedural sedation in the ED?

Answer = 0.3%

A child with laryngospasm can be a scary thing to manage. There’s no way to predict whether a child is going to get it.

You can try the usual maneuvers including a jaw-thrust, positive pressure ventilation to try to open the vocal cords, and suctioning. If these don’t work, you might consider giving the patient a paralytic, such as succinylcholine, and performing an endotracheal intubation for worsening hypoxia. Before that, what non-invasive maneuver can you try first?

 

(more…)

By |2016-11-11T19:00:18-08:00Dec 1, 2010|Pediatrics, Tricks of the Trade|
Go to Top