ACMT Toxicology Visual Pearls: The Kitchen Cabinet High

What is the primary toxin in the substance above?
- Solanine
- Myristicin
- Lysergic acid amide
- Phytolacca toxin

What is the primary toxin in the substance above?

There has been a well-documented growth in the use of FOAM in graduate medical education [1-4]. The decentralized nature of FOAM along with concerns with the lack of peer review make the assessment of the quality of information difficult. Several years ago, a group of physicians set out to solve these problems by modifying the traditional systematic review format, and created the Systematic Online Academic Resource (SOAR) review. The SOAR review aims to “systematically identify online resources by topic…[and] assess the quality of these resources with a validated tool, and collate links.” [5]
Our review, “Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Pediatric respiratory infectious disease,” [6] is the fourth in the AEM Education and Training series – and the first focusing on pediatrics. We identified 36 high-quality blog posts on this topic.
Previous SOAR reviews included the following:
| rMETRIQ Score | Topic | Blog/Podcast Post | Date of Publication |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Epiglottitis | Radiopaedia: Epiglottitis | 1/29/10 |
| 19 | Strep pharyngitis | emDOCs Podcast – Episode 27: An Understated Myth? Strep Throat & Rheumatic Fever | 4/27/21 |
| 19 | Hand-foot-and-mouth disease | Radiopaedia: Enterovirus 71 | 1/24/14 |
Looking for a blog post on bronchiolitis? Pneumonia? Croup? Look no further! You can view these high-quality blog posts in our SOAR publication (subscription required) [6]. To make it easier, you can also identify these resources by topic on PEMBlog with Dr. Brad Sobolewski (coauthor of the SOAR review):
Using 177 search terms, our initial search yielded 44,897 resources, 441 of which met criteria for quality assessment.
| Renal | Endocrine | Sickle Cell | Pediatric Resp ID | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # Reviewed | 341 | 756 | 53 | 441 |
| High Quality | 34 (10%) | 121 (16%) | 8 (15%) | 36 (8%) |
| Poor Quality* | NA | NA | 11 (21%) | 67 (15%) |
* Poor quality was not assessed in the first 2 SOAR reviews
Special thanks to SOAR coauthors Brad Sobolewski, Cindy Roskind, Andrew Grock, JooYeon Jung, Shirley Bae, and Lisa Zhao.

Traditionally large-bore tube thoracostomy has been the standard of care for treating many acute intrathoracic pathologies [1]. However, the advent of less invasive small-bore chest tubes, also known as pigtail catheters, has gradually led to a paradigm shift. Pigtails provide a less invasive and often better tolerated alternative to traditional chest tubes and allow for adequate treatment of pneumothoraces and uncomplicated pleural effusions [1-5]. Unfortunately, these less invasive catheters are not without complications – both unique and similar to traditional chest tubes.
A 48 year-old male with a history of hypertension and polysubstance abuse presented to the emergency department (ED) for shortness of breath and was found to have a left sided parapneumonic pleural effusion (Figure 1). The patient underwent thoracentesis and placement of a pigtail catheter using the Seldinger technique to drain the fluid collection. Pigtail catheter placement was confirmed by chest x-ray (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Chest x-ray with left sided pleural effusion

Figure 2: Chest x-ray with the pigtail catheter in the left chest
Despite pigtail catheter placement, there was minimal drainage from the catheter. In collaboration with the inpatient team, intrapleural thrombolytics were administered via the pigtail catheter did not resolve the issue. Although the patient’s chest x-ray did improve after the procedure, the patient continued to deteriorate clinically and became increasingly hypoxic.
A CT angiogram was then performed and showed that the pigtail catheter had been accidentally introduced through the lung parenchyma and was lodged in the left main stem bronchus (Figure 3). This was confirmed on bronchoscopy (Figure 4).

Figure 3: Chest CT angiogram showing the pigtail catheter (arrow) in the left mainstem bronchus

Figure 4: Bronchoscopy view of the left mainstem bronchus showing the pigtail catheter
This case highlights one of the more rare and potentially severe complications of small-bore chest tubes. With the increasing utilization of such devices, this case highlights the need for better education about the indications, complications, and troubleshooting approaches with these pigtail catheters.
The overall complication rate for small-bore catheters is lower than their large-bore counterparts, partly because of their smaller caliber. Also unlike traditional large-bore tube thoracostomy, the lack of tactile feedback (not feeling the pleural puncture ‘pop’ with Kelly clamps and then identifying the intrapleural space with the finger) can lead to malpositioning complications. Both approaches, however, share common complications:

What could cause this finding three days after ingestion of a concentrated household substance?

Droperidol is back! Routine use of calcium for cardiac arrest is out? TPA is… well, we won’t go there. The landscape of medicine is continuously being reshaped. New research may question the effectiveness of an existing medication or promote the arrival of a novel treatment. Once beloved medications sit dust-laden in the back of a hospital pharmacy. But sometimes, just sometimes, an old medicine arises from that dust. Phenobarbital for alcohol withdrawal comes to mind.
Could cocaine hydrochloride be one of those medications to be resurrected?
Cocaine is effective in the treatment of epistaxis. Epistaxis is an exceedingly common complaint, accounting for approximately one in 200 emergency department (ED) visits in the United States [1, 2]. If you ask any seasoned emergency physician their ideal approach to epistaxis management, chances are high that it used to include cocaine. They will exclaim how superior it was to anything used today and claim, “Not only did it vasoconstrict, but it anesthetized, as well!” If this is the case, why is cocaine hydrochloride no longer used?
This post will chronicle cocaine’s fascinating yet troubled history in medicine and expose you to another tool for your arsenal in the ED management of epistaxis.
The coca plant, native to South America, Mexico, Indonesia, and the West Indies, derives its name from the Aymaran word Khoka meaning “the tree” [3]. Coca leaves contain approximately 0.25 to 0.9% cocaine. Their use medicinally dates as far back as 1000 BC by the indigenous people of South America. The leaves were chewed for energy supplementation and altitude sickness relief. During the Incan Empire of the 13th to 16th century, the leaves were revered as sacred and served as a panacea or cure-all. Coca was used to aid in digestion, pain relief, mitigation of hunger, wound healing, and even as a local anesthetic for invasive procedures, such as cranial trephination [3, 4].
It was not until the mid-1800s that cocaine’s journey began in Europe with the German chemist, Albert Nieman. Neiman isolated the alkaloid cocaine from the coca leaf and noted its numbing properties when placed on the tongue [5]. Its anesthetic and vasoconstricting properties were soon recognized by Austrian Professor C.D. Schroff and Peruvian physician, Dr. Thomas Mareno y Maiz [4]. Its popularity in medicine, however, had yet to catch on [4–6].
1884 marked a pivotal year for cocaine use in medicine. Austrian ophthalmologist, Dr. Carl Koller, introduced cocaine as a local anesthetic for cataract and other eye surgeries, which was a groundbreaking advancement. He additionally suggested its use for additional procedures of the nose, pharynx, and larynx [4, 5, 7]. Simultaneously, Sigmund Freud, the famed Austrian neurologist, became fascinated with cocaine’s various applications and wrote Uber Coca, the first of his 5 papers on the subject. He touted it as a “magical substance” without addictive properties. Ironically – and unfortunately – Freud later realized his misjudgment and spent years grappling with cocaine addiction [4, 5, 7].
Cocaine’s use as a local and regional anesthetic spread widely across Europe and to America from there. Influential American surgeons like Dr. William Halstead, a founder of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and his student, Dr. James Corning, further advanced its clinical applications by using cocaine as the first agent for regional nerve blocks and spinal anesthesia [8]. Like Freud, Dr. Halsted became addicted to cocaine and later morphine, which he used to wean his cocaine addiction.
In the early 1900s the medical use of cocaine declined due to increased reports of side effects, the development of safer alternatives such as procaine, and strict regulatory measures such as the 1914 Harrison Narcotics Tax Act [9].
Most of today’s medical use of cocaine is by the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) community. In fact, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery has had a position statement on cocaine since 1886 that reads [10]:
The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery considers cocaine to be a valuable anesthetic and vasoconstricting agent when used as part of the treatment of a patient by a physician. No other single drug combines the anesthetic and vasoconstricting properties of cocaine.
Cocaine hydrochloride is FDA-approved for local anesthesia for adult nasal procedures. Though not FDA-approved, it is also commonly used by ENT physicians as a hemostatic agent to prevent post-procedure bleeding and as a decongestant to promote a clearer view of the nasal passageways during surgery [11–14]. In the ED, it has been used off-label to treat epistaxis [11, 13, 15, 16] and as an anesthetic and analgesic before fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation [8].
Cocaine is an alkaloid ester with weak basic properties. The addition of hydrochloride salt forms cocaine hydrochloride. In this form, cocaine is soluble in aqueous solution and can be used for ENT procedures. Its anesthetic properties occur via blockage of voltage-gated sodium channels. Vasoconstriction and hemostasis occur due to inhibition of catecholamine reuptake, including norepinephrine [9, 11].
Cocaine hydrochloride is a clear, green solution. It comes in a single-unit bottle with concentrations ranging from 4-10%. Only the 4% solution is currently recommended as it has similar efficacy to higher concentrations with fewer side effects [11, 22]. The 10% solution should be avoided as it has been associated with toxicity and adverse events [8, 17, 20, 23]. Typically the 4% solution is dispensed in 1 mL or 4 mL single-use bottles.
There is limited research available on the use of intranasal cocaine in the ED for epistaxis management, or any other condition. Studies from the ENT literature have shown that cocaine has similar efficacy to most vasoconstrictors including epinephrine and phenylephrine for preventing bleeding after intranasal procedures [26–30]. The literature is mixed on oxymetazoline (Afrin) in epistaxis with some studies showing it may have superior efficacy in preventing post-procedure epistaxis [31, 32]. However, oxymetazoline lacks any anesthetic properties.
Concerns about cocaine hydrochloride’s intranasal use primarily revolve around its potential for systemic cardiovascular toxicity. Historical case reports of varying quality have documented significant adverse events including myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac arrhythmias following intranasal use during ENT procedures and epistaxis management [21, 33, 34]. A dive into these reports, however, shows that a concentration and dose over the accepted 4% concentration and 200 mg maximum dose was frequently used in these cases. Many confounders also existed, such as a history of cardiac disease and concomitant medication administration (including general anesthesia) [34, 35]. There have been many contemporary studies comparing cocaine to other vasoconstricting/anesthetic agents in the ENT literature. In these studies, cocaine has not been shown to cause serious adverse CNS or cardiac events including MI, dangerous arrhythmias, or death [28, 32, 36–41].
It is important to note that most of the randomized control studies excluded patients with cardiac disease. It is therefore recommended to avoid the use of cocaine in patients with a history of MI, CAD, congenital heart disease, or uncontrolled hypertension [18, 34]. Cocaine should also be avoided in patients on beta-blocker therapy, from limited studies demonstrating increased coronary vasoconstriction with concomitant administration [20, 42].
The most common side effects are mild blood pressure elevation, mild tachycardia, non-emergent headache, and anxiety [18, 43]. Although rare, signs to watch for that could indicate severe CNS or cardiovascular toxicity include: agitation, seizure activity, hyperthermia, significant hypertension, significant tachycardia or arrhythmias, chest pain, and MI [25, 34].
It is recommended that patients receiving intranasal cocaine should have continuous cardiac monitoring and frequent vital sign checks, assessing for hypertension and tachycardia [21].


A 23-year-old female with no known past medical history presented with a rash concentrated on her legs, with a few areas on her arms and chest. The rash began the day before presentation when she became overheated while wearing sweatpants in 104°F weather. The rash was mildly pruritic but not painful. She denied any prior reaction to her sweatpants that she has had for several months. She denied any new soap or cosmetic use, prior rash, allergy, or medication use. Her review of systems and past medical history were negative.

What is the primary cause of death following ingestion of the plant pictured?