ALiEM AIR Series | Renal Module (2023)

Welcome to the AIR Renal/GU Module! After carefully reviewing all relevant posts in the past 12 months from the top 50 sites of the Digital Impact Factor [1], the ALiEM AIR Team is proud to present the highest quality online content related to related to renal / GU emergencies in the Emergency Department. 6 blog posts met our standard of online excellence and were approved for residency training by the AIR Series Board. More specifically, we identified 3 AIR and 3 Honorable Mentions. We recommend programs give 3 hours of III credit for this module.

AIR Stamp of Approval and Honorable Mentions

In an effort to truly emphasize the highest quality posts, we have 2 subsets of recommended resources. The AIR stamp of approval is awarded only to posts scoring above a strict scoring cut-off of ≥30 points (out of 35 total), based on our scoring instrument. The other subset is for “Honorable Mention” posts. These posts have been flagged by and agreed upon by AIR Board members as worthwhile, accurate, unbiased, and appropriately referenced despite an average score.

Take the AIR Renal/GU Module at ALiEMU

Interested in taking the AIR quiz for fun or asynchronous (Individualized Interactive Instruction) credit? Please go to the above link. You will need to create a free, 1-time login account.

Highlighted Quality Posts: Renal / GU

SiteArticleAuthorDateLabel
EMCritAcute Kidney InjuryJosh FarkasMarch, 16, 2023AIR
EMCrit Hepatorenal SyndromeJosh FarkasApril 3, 2023AIR
EM DocsUrine trouble: approach to pediatric UTIJoe RaveraDecember 7, 2022HM
EM DocsTesticular TorsionBrit LongAugust 8, 2023HM
EM OttawaTesticular torsionAlex ViauJuly 27, 2023HM

(AIR = Approved Instructional Resource; HM = Honorable Mention)

 

If you have any questions or comments on the AIR series, or this AIR module, please contact us!

 

Reference

  1. Lin M, Phipps M, Chan TM, et al. Digital Impact Factor: A Quality Index for Educational Blogs and Podcasts in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;82(1):55-65. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.02.011, PMID 36967275

 

Top 3 SOAR Blog Posts on Pediatric Respiratory Infectious Disease

pediatric respiratory infectious diseases soar review

There has been a well-documented growth in the use of FOAM in graduate medical education [1-4]. The decentralized nature of FOAM along with concerns with the lack of peer review make the assessment of the quality of information difficult. Several years ago, a group of physicians set out to solve these problems by modifying the traditional systematic review format, and created the Systematic Online Academic Resource (SOAR) review. The SOAR review aims to “systematically identify online resources by topic…[and] assess the quality of these resources with a validated tool, and collate links.” [5]

Our review, “Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Pediatric respiratory infectious disease,” [6] is the fourth in the AEM Education and Training series – and the first focusing on pediatrics. We identified 36 high-quality blog posts on this topic.

Previous SOAR reviews included the following:

What were the top 3 posts for pediatric respiratory ID?

rMETRIQ ScoreTopicBlog/Podcast PostDate of Publication
20EpiglottitisRadiopaedia: Epiglottitis1/29/10
19Strep pharyngitisemDOCs Podcast – Episode 27: An Understated Myth? Strep Throat & Rheumatic Fever4/27/21
19Hand-foot-and-mouth diseaseRadiopaedia: Enterovirus 711/24/14

How can I find the entire list of the 36 high-quality blog posts?

Looking for a blog post on bronchiolitis? Pneumonia? Croup? Look no further! You can view these high-quality blog posts in our SOAR publication (subscription required) [6]. To make it easier, you can also identify these resources by topic on PEMBlog with Dr. Brad Sobolewski (coauthor of the SOAR review):

  1. Bronchiolitis
  2. Epiglottitis
  3. Pneumonia
  4. Croup
  5. Everything else

How did we arrive at 36 blog posts?

Using 177 search terms, our initial search yielded 44,897 resources, 441 of which met criteria for quality assessment.

  • 36 of the 441 blog posts reached the high-quality cutoff score of ≥16 using the rMETRIQ scoring tool.
  • 67 of the 441 blog posts had an rMETRIQ score of ≤7, meeting the threshold for poor quality.
  • Similar to prior SOAR reviews, there was an uneven distribution of blog posts for each topic.
  • For all of the posts reviewed, the highest mean scores were seen in the first 3 questions of the rMETRIQ tool, which relate to the “Content” domain (vs. the “Credibility” and “Review” domains).
  • Only 5 of the 441 posts specified an intended audience level.

How do our findings compare to prior SOAR Reviews?

RenalEndocrineSickle CellPediatric Resp ID
# Reviewed34175653441
High Quality34 (10%)121 (16%)8 (15%)36 (8%)
Poor Quality*NANA11 (21%)67 (15%)

* Poor quality was not assessed in the first 2 SOAR reviews

Special thanks to SOAR coauthors Brad Sobolewski, Cindy Roskind, Andrew Grock, JooYeon Jung, Shirley Bae, and Lisa Zhao.

References

  1. Purdy E, Thoma B, Bednarczyk J, Migneault D, Sherbino J. The use of free online educational resources by Canadian emergency medicine residents and program directors. Can J Emerg Med. 2015;17(2):101-106. doi:10.1017/cem.2014.73. PMID 25927253
  2. Mallin M, Schlein S, Doctor S, Stroud S, Dawson M, Fix M. A survey of the current utilization of asynchronous education among emergency medicine residents in the United States. Acad Med. 2014;89(4):598-601. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000170. PMID 24556776
  3. Thurtle N, Banks C, Cox M, Pain T, Furyk J. Free open access medical education resource knowledge and utilisation amongst emergency medicine trainees: a survey in four countries. Afr J Emerg Med. 2016;6(1):12-17. doi:10.1016/J.AFJEM.2015.10.005. PMID 30456058
  4. Reiter DA, Lakoff DJ, Trueger NS, Shah KH. Individual interactive instruction: an innovative enhancement to resident education. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(1):110-113. doi:10.1016/J. ANNEMERGMED.2012.02.028. PMID 22520994
  5. Grock A, Bhalerao A, Chan TM, Thoma B, Wescott AB, Trueger NS. Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: renal and genitourinary. AEM Educ Train. 2019;3(4):375-386. doi:10.1002/ aet2.10351. PMID 31637355
  6. Belfer J, Roskind CG, Grock A, et al. Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Pediatric respiratory infectious disease. AEM Educ Train. 2024;8(1):e10945. Published 2024 Feb 21. doi:10.1002/aet2.10945. PMID 38510728

Pigtail catheter for pleural drainage: Tips to minimize complications

pigtail

Traditionally large-bore tube thoracostomy has been the standard of care for treating many acute intrathoracic pathologies [1]. However, the advent of less invasive small-bore chest tubes, also known as pigtail catheters, has gradually led to a paradigm shift. Pigtails provide a less invasive and often better tolerated alternative to traditional chest tubes and allow for adequate treatment of pneumothoraces and uncomplicated pleural effusions [1-5]. Unfortunately, these less invasive catheters are not without complications – both unique and similar to traditional chest tubes.

Case

A 48 year-old male with a history of hypertension and polysubstance abuse presented to the emergency department (ED) for shortness of breath and was found to have a left sided parapneumonic pleural effusion (Figure 1). The patient underwent thoracentesis and placement of a pigtail catheter using the Seldinger technique to drain the fluid collection. Pigtail catheter placement was confirmed by chest x-ray (Figure 2).

pleural effusion chest x-ray

Figure 1: Chest x-ray with left sided pleural effusion

pleural effusion chest x-ray pigtail catheter

Figure 2: Chest x-ray with the pigtail catheter in the left chest

Case Progression

Despite pigtail catheter placement, there was minimal drainage from the catheter. In collaboration with the inpatient team, intrapleural thrombolytics were administered via the pigtail catheter did not resolve the issue. Although the patient’s chest x-ray did improve after the procedure, the patient continued to deteriorate clinically and became increasingly hypoxic.

A CT angiogram was then performed and showed that the pigtail catheter had been accidentally introduced through the lung parenchyma and was lodged in the left main stem bronchus (Figure 3). This was confirmed on bronchoscopy (Figure 4).

pigtail catheter chest ct in bronchus

Figure 3: Chest CT angiogram showing the pigtail catheter (arrow) in the left mainstem bronchus

bronchoscopy pigtail

Figure 4: Bronchoscopy view of the left mainstem bronchus showing the pigtail catheter

This case highlights one of the more rare and potentially severe complications of small-bore chest tubes. With the increasing utilization of such devices, this case  highlights the need for better education about the indications, complications, and troubleshooting approaches with these pigtail catheters. 

Complications

The overall complication rate for small-bore catheters is lower than their large-bore counterparts, partly because of their smaller caliber. Also unlike traditional large-bore tube thoracostomy, the lack of tactile feedback (not feeling the pleural puncture ‘pop’ with Kelly clamps and then identifying the intrapleural space with the finger) can lead to malpositioning complications. Both approaches, however, share common complications:

  • Most common complication: Chest tube kinking and obstruction [6, 7, 10]
    • Due to the small caliber of the pigtail catheter, it can easily become twisted or kinked between the pleura and lung parenchyma, obstructed within lung fissures, or kinked externally between the body and environment [9].
    • Obstruction may also occur from clotted blood [9] or pleural effusion loculations [12, 13] within the catheter lumen.
      • For loculated effusions and empyemas, an interdisciplinary inpatient discussion should weigh the pros and cons of intrapleural thrombolytics versus surgical drainage and pleurodesis.
      • One often used thrombolytic regimen is the MIST-II protocol, which involves the combination of alteplase (tPA) 10 mg BID plus dornase alfa (DNase) 5 mg BID [13, 14].
  • Laceration of tissue/vessel [2, 3, 6, 8]
    • Can be prevented by using standard landmarks and inserting above the rib margin
  • Air emboli [2, 3, 6, 9]
    • Thought to be due to parenchymal injury resulting in a fistula involving the pulmonary vessels
  • Parenchymal injury [9]

References

  1. Gammie JS, Banks MC, Fuhrman CR, et al. The pigtail catheter for pleural drainage: a less invasive alternative to tube thoracostomy. JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 1999;3(1):57-61. PMID: 10323171
  2. Saqib A, Ibrahim U, Maroun R. An unusual complication of pigtail catheter insertion. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2018;10(10):5964-5967. doi:https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.05.65
  3. Broder JS, Al-Jarani B, Lanan B, Brooks K. Pigtail Catheter Insertion Error: Root Cause Analysis and Recommendations for Patient Safety. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2020;53(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.10.003
  4. Vetrugno L, Guadagnin GM, Barbariol F, et al. Assessment of Pleural Effusion and Small Pleural Drain Insertion by Resident Doctors in an Intensive Care Unit: An Observational Study. Clinical Medicine Insights Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine. 2019;13:1179548419871527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1179548419871527
  5. Kulvatunyou N, Vijayasekaran A, Hansen A, et al. Two-year experience of using pigtail catheters to treat traumatic pneumothorax: a changing trend. J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1104-1107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e31822dd130
  6. Remérand F, Luce V, Badachi Y, Lu Q, Bouhemad B, Rouby JJ. Incidence of Chest Tube Malposition in the Critically Ill. Anesthesiology. 2007;106(6):1112-1119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000267594.80368.01
  7. Horsley A, Jones L, White J, Henry M. Efficacy and Complications of Small-Bore, Wire-Guided Chest Drains. Chest. 2006;130(6):1857-1863. doi:https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.130.6.1857
  8. Hyo Jin Kim, Yang Hyun Cho, Gee Young Suh, Jeong Hoon Yang, Jeon K. Subclavian Artery Laceration Caused by Pigtail Catheter Removal in a Patient with Pneumothorax. The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2015;30(2):119-122. doi:https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2015.30.2.119
  9. Anderson D, Chen SA, Godoy LA, Brown LM, Cooke DT. Comprehensive Review of Chest Tube Management: A Review. JAMA surgery. 2022;157(3):269-274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.7050
  10. Aho JM, Ruparel RK, Rowse PG, Brahmbhatt RD, Jenkins D, Rivera M. Tube Thoracostomy: A Structured Review of Case Reports and a Standardized Format for Reporting Complications. World Journal of Surgery. 2015;39(11):2691-2706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3158-6
  11. Gayer G, Rozenman J, Hoffmann C, et al. CT diagnosis of malpositioned chest tubes. Br J Radiol. 2000;73(871):786-790. doi: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.73.871.11089474
  12. Altmann, E. S., Crossingham, I., Wilson, S., & Davies, H. R. (2019). Intra-pleural fibrinolytic therapy versus placebo, or a different fibrinolytic agent, in the treatment of adult parapneumonic effusions and empyema. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2019(10), CD002312. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002312.pub4
  13. Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, et al. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(6):518-526. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1012740
  14. Chaddha U, Agrawal A, Feller-Kopman D, et al. Use of fibrinolytics and deoxyribonuclease in adult patients with pleural empyema: a consensus statement. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(9):1050-1064. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30533-6. PMID 33545086

By |2024-04-14T09:44:45-07:00Apr 12, 2024|Pulmonary, Trauma|

Cocaine for Epistaxis: What was old is new again

cocaine for epistaxis

Droperidol is back! Routine use of calcium for cardiac arrest is out? TPA is… well, we won’t go there. The landscape of medicine is continuously being reshaped. New research may question the effectiveness of an existing medication or promote the arrival of a novel treatment. Once beloved medications sit dust-laden in the back of a hospital pharmacy. But sometimes, just sometimes, an old medicine arises from that dust. Phenobarbital for alcohol withdrawal comes to mind.

Could cocaine hydrochloride be one of those medications to be resurrected?

Cocaine is effective in the treatment of epistaxis. Epistaxis is an exceedingly common complaint, accounting for approximately one in 200 emergency department (ED) visits in the United States [1, 2]. If you ask any seasoned emergency physician their ideal approach to epistaxis management, chances are high that it used to include cocaine. They will exclaim how superior it was to anything used today and claim, “Not only did it vasoconstrict, but it anesthetized, as well!” If this is the case, why is cocaine hydrochloride no longer used?

This post will chronicle cocaine’s fascinating yet troubled history in medicine and expose you to another tool for your arsenal in the ED management of epistaxis.

History

The coca plant, native to South America, Mexico, Indonesia, and the West Indies, derives its name from the Aymaran word Khoka meaning “the tree” [3]. Coca leaves contain approximately 0.25 to 0.9% cocaine. Their use medicinally dates as far back as 1000 BC by the indigenous people of South America. The leaves were chewed for energy supplementation and altitude sickness relief. During the Incan Empire of the 13th to 16th century, the leaves were revered as sacred and served as a panacea or cure-all. Coca was used to aid in digestion, pain relief, mitigation of hunger, wound healing, and even as a local anesthetic for invasive procedures, such as cranial trephination [3, 4].

It was not until the mid-1800s that cocaine’s journey began in Europe with the German chemist, Albert Nieman. Neiman isolated the alkaloid cocaine from the coca leaf and noted its numbing properties when placed on the tongue [5]. Its anesthetic and vasoconstricting properties were soon recognized by Austrian Professor C.D. Schroff and Peruvian physician, Dr. Thomas Mareno y Maiz [4]. Its popularity in medicine, however, had yet to catch on [4–6].

1884 marked a pivotal year for cocaine use in medicine. Austrian ophthalmologist, Dr. Carl Koller, introduced cocaine as a local anesthetic for cataract and other eye surgeries, which was a groundbreaking advancement. He additionally suggested its use for additional procedures of the nose, pharynx, and larynx [4, 5, 7]. Simultaneously, Sigmund Freud, the famed Austrian neurologist, became fascinated with cocaine’s various applications and wrote Uber Coca, the first of his 5 papers on the subject. He touted it as a “magical substance” without addictive properties. Ironically – and unfortunately – Freud later realized his misjudgment and spent years grappling with cocaine addiction [4, 5, 7].

Cocaine’s use as a local and regional anesthetic spread widely across Europe and to America from there. Influential American surgeons like Dr. William Halstead, a founder of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and his student, Dr. James Corning, further advanced its clinical applications by using cocaine as the first agent for regional nerve blocks and spinal anesthesia [8]. Like Freud, Dr. Halsted became addicted to cocaine and later morphine, which he used to wean his cocaine addiction.

In the early 1900s the medical use of cocaine declined due to increased reports of side effects, the development of safer alternatives such as procaine, and strict regulatory measures such as the 1914 Harrison Narcotics Tax Act [9].

Today’s Use in Medicine

Most of today’s medical use of cocaine is by the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) community. In fact, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery has had a position statement on cocaine since 1886 that reads [10]:

The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery considers cocaine to be a valuable anesthetic and vasoconstricting agent when used as part of the treatment of a patient by a physician. No other single drug combines the anesthetic and vasoconstricting properties of cocaine.

FDA Approval

Cocaine hydrochloride is FDA-approved for local anesthesia for adult nasal procedures. Though not FDA-approved, it is also commonly used by ENT physicians as a hemostatic agent to prevent post-procedure bleeding and as a decongestant to promote a clearer view of the nasal passageways during surgery [11–14]. In the ED, it has been used off-label to treat epistaxis [11, 13, 15, 16] and as an anesthetic and analgesic before fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation [8].

Mechanism of Action

Cocaine is an alkaloid ester with weak basic properties. The addition of hydrochloride salt forms cocaine hydrochloride. In this form, cocaine is soluble in aqueous solution and can be used for ENT procedures. Its anesthetic properties occur via blockage of voltage-gated sodium channels. Vasoconstriction and hemostasis occur due to inhibition of catecholamine reuptake, including norepinephrine [9, 11].

Pharmacokinetics

  • Intranasal absorption: 4-33% [17–19]
  • Onset: 2-5 minutes [8]
  • Duration: 30-45 minutes [8]

Preparations

Cocaine hydrochloride is a clear, green solution. It comes in a single-unit bottle with concentrations ranging from 4-10%. Only the 4% solution is currently recommended as it has similar efficacy to higher concentrations with fewer side effects [11, 22]. The 10% solution should be avoided as it has been associated with toxicity and adverse events [8, 17, 20, 23]. Typically the 4% solution is dispensed in 1 mL or 4 mL single-use bottles.

Efficacy

There is limited research available on the use of intranasal cocaine in the ED for epistaxis management, or any other condition. Studies from the ENT literature have shown that cocaine has similar efficacy to most vasoconstrictors including epinephrine and phenylephrine for preventing bleeding after intranasal procedures [26–30]. The literature is mixed on oxymetazoline (Afrin) in epistaxis with some studies showing it may have superior efficacy in preventing post-procedure epistaxis [31, 32]. However, oxymetazoline lacks any anesthetic properties.

Safety

Concerns about cocaine hydrochloride’s intranasal use primarily revolve around its potential for systemic cardiovascular toxicity. Historical case reports of varying quality have documented significant adverse events including myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiac arrhythmias following intranasal use during ENT procedures and epistaxis management [21, 33, 34]. A dive into these reports, however, shows that a concentration and dose over the accepted 4% concentration and 200 mg maximum dose was frequently used in these cases. Many confounders also existed, such as a history of cardiac disease and concomitant medication administration (including general anesthesia) [34, 35]. There have been many contemporary studies comparing cocaine to other vasoconstricting/anesthetic agents in the ENT literature. In these studies, cocaine has not been shown to cause serious adverse CNS or cardiac events including MI, dangerous arrhythmias, or death [28, 32, 36–41].

It is important to note that most of the randomized control studies excluded patients with cardiac disease. It is therefore recommended to avoid the use of cocaine in patients with a history of MI, CAD, congenital heart disease, or uncontrolled hypertension [18, 34]. Cocaine should also be avoided in patients on beta-blocker therapy, from limited studies demonstrating increased coronary vasoconstriction with concomitant administration [20, 42].

Side Effects

The most common side effects are mild blood pressure elevation, mild tachycardia, non-emergent headache, and anxiety [18, 43]. Although rare, signs to watch for that could indicate severe CNS or cardiovascular toxicity include: agitation, seizure activity, hyperthermia, significant hypertension, significant tachycardia or arrhythmias, chest pain, and MI [25, 34].

It is recommended that patients receiving intranasal cocaine should have continuous cardiac monitoring and frequent vital sign checks, assessing for hypertension and tachycardia [21].

Contraindications [11, 24, 25]

Absolute

  • History of allergy to cocaine or substitutes of topical solution

Relative

  • History of cardiovascular disease (uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, MI, coronary artery disease, congestive heart disease, congenital heart disease): Increased risk of cardiac adverse event
  • Seizure/epilepsy history: May decrease seizure threshold
  • Active asthma exacerbation: May cause bronchoconstriction
  • Drug interactions:
    • Beta-blockers: May lead to hypertensive crisis through unopposed alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction
    • Lidocaine/category 1A & 1C antiarrhythmics: Concurrent sodium channel blockade
    • Epinephrine or phenylephrine: Historical reports of MI and ventricular arrhythmia
    • Succinylcholine: Co-metabolism by plasma cholinesterase may lead to increased toxicity
    • Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs): Increased risk of seizures
    • Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors (MAOIs): Prevent breakdown of catecholamines and can lead to toxicity
    • Disulfiram: Increases plasma cocaine and could lead to toxicity

Special Populations

  1. Pregnancy: Category C (may cause fetal harm). Avoid use during pregnancy [24, 25].
  2. Lactation: Avoid use during lactation [25].
  3. Pediatric: Not well studied

Barriers to Use

  1. Regulations
    • Schedule II drug (high potential for abuse with potentially severe psychological or physical dependence)
    • Requires storage in a locked cabinet and maintenance of separate written records of use
  2. Time to treatment: May take longer to obtain from the pharmacy compared to alternatives, given storage considerations and whether dispensed from the hospital (rather than ED) pharmacy
  3. Drug testing: Discuss with patients before use that cocaine may be detected up to 1 week in blood and even longer in urine [25].

Applying Cocaine in Epistaxis (24, 25)

  1. You will need at least 80 mg of 4% cocaine hydrochloride.
    • If your hospital stocks the 1 mL bottle of 40 mg/mL cocaine hydrochloride, you should obtain 2 vials (80 mg total). Use 2 separate pledgets, immersing each one in its own bottle.
    • Alternatively, if your hospital stocks the 160 mg/4 mL solution, soak 4 pledgets in the entire 4 mL solution.
    • Each pledget will absorb approximately 1 mL of the 4% solution.
  2. Once fully adsorbed, place 1-2 pledgets in the nasal cavity with epistaxis, positioned against the septum.
  3. Leave the pledgets in place for up to 20 minutes.
  4. Assess for hemostasis.
  5. If needed, you can use a maximum of 2 additional pledgets, if epistaxis does not resolve. The maximum dose should be the lower dose of 200 mg or 2 mg/kg.

Proposed ED Epistaxis Algorithm [16, 44]

Takeaways

  1. In the right patient, cocaine may have a place in the management of epistaxis. Avoid in patients with cardiovascular disease.
  2. Cocaine is the only single agent that both vasoconstricts and anesthetizes.
  3. Insert 1-2 pledgets soaked each with 40 mg of cocaine hydrochloride into the affected nare for 20 minutes.
  4. The maximum dose is 2 mg/kg or 200 mg, whichever is lower.

  1. Newton E, Lasso A, Petrcich W, Kilty SJ. An outcomes analysis of anterior epistaxis management in the emergency department. J Otolaryngol – Head Neck Surg J Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Chir Cervico-Faciale. 2016;45:24. doi:10.1186/s40463-016-0138-2. PMID: 27066834
  2. Pallin DJ, Chng YM, McKay MP, Emond JA, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA. Epidemiology of epistaxis in US emergency departments, 1992 to 2001. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46(1):77-81. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.014. PMID: 15988431
  3. Biondich AS, Joslin JD. Coca: The History and Medical Significance of an Ancient Andean Tradition. Emerg Med Int. 2016;2016:4048764. doi:10.1155/2016/4048764. PMID: 27144028
  4. Brain PF, Coward GA. A review of the history, actions, and legitimate uses of cocaine. J Subst Abuse. 1989;1(4):431-451. PMID: 2485453
  5. Redman M. Cocaine: What is the Crack? A Brief History of the Use of Cocaine as an Anesthetic. Anesthesiol Pain Med. 2011;1(2):95-97. doi:10.5812/kowsar.22287523.189. PMID: 25729664
  6. Grzybowski A. [The history of cocaine in medicine and its importance to the discovery of the different forms of anaesthesia]. Klin Oczna. 2007;109(1-3):101-105. PMID: 17687926
  7. Cocaine – Definition, Crack & Plant. HISTORY. Published August 21, 2018. Accessed January 3, 2024.
  8. Roberts JR, Custalow CB, Thomsen TW, eds. Roberts and Hedges’ Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine. Seventh edition. Elsevier; 2019.
  9. Goldstein RA, DesLauriers C, Burda A, Johnson-Arbor K. Cocaine: history, social implications, and toxicity: a review. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2009;26(1):10-17. doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2008.12.001. PMID: 19292024
  10. American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Committee. Position Statement: Medical Use of Cocaine. Published online July 31, 2014. Accessed January 3, 2024.
  11. Lutfallah SC, Brown E, Spillers NJ, et al. Topical Cocaine Hydrochloride Nasal Solution: Anesthetic and Surgical Considerations. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e42804. doi:10.7759/cureus.42804. PMID: 37664274
  12. De R, Uppal HS, Shehab ZP, Hilger AW, Wilson PS, Courteney-Harris R. Current practices of cocaine administration by UK otorhinolaryngologists. J Laryngol Otol. 2003;117(2):109-112. doi:10.1258/002221503762624530. PMID: 12625882
  13. Reid JW, Rotenberg BW, Sowerby LJ. Contemporary decongestant practices of Canadian otolaryngologists for endoscopic sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol – Head Neck Surg J Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Chir Cervico-Faciale. 2019;48(1):15. doi:10.1186/s40463-019-0337-8. PMID: 30885260
  14. Long H, Greller H, Mercurio-Zappala M, Nelson LS, Hoffman RS. Medicinal use of cocaine: a shifting paradigm over 25 years. The Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9):1625-1629. doi:10.1097/00005537-200409000-00022. PMID: 15475793
  15. Seikaly H. Epistaxis. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(10):944-951. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp2019344. PMID: 33704939
  16. Tunkel DE, Anne S, Payne SC, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Nosebleed (Epistaxis). Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2020;162(1_suppl):S1-S38. doi:10.1177/0194599819890327. PMID: 31910111
  17. Liao BS, Hilsinger RL, Rasgon BM, Matsuoka K, Adour KK. A preliminary study of cocaine absorption from the nasal mucosa. The Laryngoscope. 1999;109(1):98-102. doi:10.1097/00005537-199901000-00019. PMID: 9917048
  18. Dwyer C, Sowerby L, Rotenberg BW. Is cocaine a safe topical agent for use during endoscopic sinus surgery? The Laryngoscope. 2016;126(8):1721-1723. doi:10.1002/lary.25836. PMID: 27075241
  19. McGrath J, McGrath A, Burdett J, Shokri T, Cohn JE. Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Topical Intranasal Cocaine in Healthy Subjects. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020;34(3):336-341. doi:10.1177/1945892419896241. PMID: 31856588
  20. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Yancy CW, et al. Cocaine-induced coronary-artery vasoconstriction. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(23):1557-1562. doi:10.1056/NEJM198912073212301. PMID: 2573838
  21. Richards JR, Laurin EG, Tabish N, Lange RA. Acute Toxicity from Topical Cocaine for Epistaxis: Treatment with Labetalol. J Emerg Med. 2017;52(3):311-313. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.08.006. PMID: 27693072
  22. Lu IC, Hsieh YH, Hsu HT, et al. Comparison of 4% and 6% topical cocaine solutions for reduction of epistaxis induced by nasotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica Off J Taiwan Soc Anesthesiol. 2014;52(1):17-21. doi:10.1016/j.aat.2014.05.001. PMID: 24999214
  23. Gurudevan SV, Nelson MD, Rader F, et al. Cocaine-induced vasoconstriction in the human coronary microcirculation: new evidence from myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation. 2013;128(6):598-604. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002937. PMID: 23812179
  24. Genus Lifesciences Inc. GOPRELTO- cocaine hydrochloride solution Reference ID: 4195367. Published online December 2017.
  25. Micromedex Solutions. Cocaine Hydrochloride. Published online November 30, 2023.
  26. Rector FT, DeNuccio DJ, Alden MA. A comparison of cocaine, oxymetazoline, and saline for nasotracheal intubation. AANA J. 1987;55(1):49-54. PMID: 3551442
  27. Gross JB, Hartigan ML, Schaffer DW. A suitable substitute for 4% cocaine before blind nasotracheal intubation: 3% lidocaine-0.25% phenylephrine nasal spray. Anesth Analg. 1984;63(10):915-918. PMID: 3551442
  28. Valdes CJ, Bogado M, Rammal A, Samaha M, Tewfik MA. Topical cocaine vs adrenaline in endoscopic sinus surgery: a blinded randomized controlled study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014;4(8):646-650. doi:10.1002/alr.21325. PMID: 24678064
  29. Sessler CN, Vitaliti JC, Cooper KR, Jones JR, Powell KD, Pesko LJ. Comparison of 4% lidocaine/0.5% phenylephrine with 5% cocaine: which dilates the nasal passage better? Anesthesiology. 1986;64(2):274-277. doi:10.1097/00000542-198602000-00028. PMID: 3946816
  30. Campbell JP, Campbell CD, Warren DW, Prazma TU, Pillsbury HC. Comparison of the vasoconstrictive and anesthetic effects of intranasally applied cocaine vs. xylometazoline/lidocaine solution. Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 1992;107(5):697-700. doi:10.1177/019459989210700511. PMID: 1279502
  31. Katz RI, Hovagim AR, Finkelstein HS, Grinberg Y, Boccio RV, Poppers PJ. A comparison of cocaine, lidocaine with epinephrine, and oxymetazoline for prevention of epistaxis on nasotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 1990;2(1):16-20. doi:10.1016/0952-8180(90)90043-3. PMID: 2310576
  32. Riegle EV, Gunter JB, Lusk RP, Muntz HR, Weiss KL. Comparison of vasoconstrictors for functional endoscopic sinus surgery in children. The Laryngoscope. 1992;102(7):820-823. doi:10.1288/00005537-199207000-00012. PMID: 1614253
  33. Ross GS, Bell J. Myocardial infarction associated with inappropriate use of topical cocaine as treatment for epistaxis. Am J Emerg Med. 1992;10(3):219-222. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(92)90213-H. PMID: 1586432
  34. Higgins TS, Hwang PH, Kingdom TT, Orlandi RR, Stammberger H, Han JK. Systematic review of topical vasoconstrictors in endoscopic sinus surgery. The Laryngoscope. 2011;121(2):422-432. doi:10.1002/lary.21286. PMID: 21271600
  35. Meyers EF. Cocaine toxicity during dacryocystorhinostomy. Arch Ophthalmol Chic Ill 1960. 1980;98(5):842-843. doi:10.1001/archopht.1980.01020030836006. PMID: 7378007
  36. MacNeil SD, Rotenberg B, Sowerby L, Allen B, Richard L, Shariff SZ. Medical use of cocaine and perioperative morbidity following sinonasal surgery-A population study. PloS One. 2020;15(7):e0236356. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236356. PMID: 32730351
  37. McGrath J, McGrath A, Burdett J, Shokri T, Cohn JE. Investigation of topical intranasal cocaine for sinonasal procedures: a randomized, phase III clinical trial. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020;10(8):981-990. doi:10.1002/alr.22561. PMID: 32384578
  38. Pfleiderer AG, Brockbank M. Cocaine and adrenaline: a safe or necessary combination in the nose? A study to determine the effect of adrenaline on the absorption and adverse side effects of cocaine. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1988;13(6):421-426. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2273.1988.tb00315.x. PMID: 2465851
  39. Delilkan AE, Gnanapragasam A. Topical cocaine/adrenaline combination in intransal surgery–is it necessary? Anaesth Intensive Care. 1978;6(4):328-332. doi:10.1177/0310057X7800600406. PMID: 736254
  40. Alhaddad ST, Khanna AK, Mascha EJ, Abdelmalak BB. Phenylephrine as an alternative to cocaine for nasal vasoconstriction before nasal surgery: A randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2013;57(2):163-169. doi:10.4103/0019-5049.111844. PMID: 23825816
  41. Kara CO, Kaftan A, Atalay H, Pinar HS, Oğmen G. Cardiovascular safety of cocaine anaesthesia in the presence of adrenaline during septal surgery. J Otolaryngol. 2001;30(3):145-148. doi:10.2310/7070.2001.20197. PMID: 11771042
  42. Lange RA, Cigarroa RG, Flores ED, et al. Potentiation of cocaine-induced coronary vasoconstriction by beta-adrenergic blockade. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(12):897-903. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-112-12-897. PMID: 1971166
  43. Drivas EI, Hajiioannou JK, Lachanas VA, Bizaki AJ, Kyrmizakis DE, Bizakis JG. Cocaine versus tetracaine in septoplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121(2):130-133. doi:10.1017/S0022215106002386. PMID: 17274862.
  44. Gottlieb M, Long B. Managing Epistaxis. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;81(2):234-240. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.07.002. PMID: 36117013

SAEM Clinical Images Series: Red Rash on My Legs

milaria

A 23-year-old female with no known past medical history presented with a rash concentrated on her legs, with a few areas on her arms and chest. The rash began the day before presentation when she became overheated while wearing sweatpants in 104°F weather. The rash was mildly pruritic but not painful. She denied any prior reaction to her sweatpants that she has had for several months. She denied any new soap or cosmetic use, prior rash, allergy, or medication use. Her review of systems and past medical history were negative.

Vitals: Normal

Skin: An erythematous papular rash is concentrated and symmetric on her lower extremities. There are a few sparse lesions on her arms, thorax, and abdomen with sparing of the palms, soles, and face. No pustules or vesicles are noted. There is no scale or crust. No other skin lesions are present. The rest of the examination is normal.

Non-contributory

Miliaria, or prickly heat (heat rash).

Miliaria, also known as prickly heat or heat rash, is caused by blocked eccrine sweat glands and ducts. Exposure to heat with sweating causes eccrine sweat to pass into the dermis or epidermis causing a rash. It is common in warm and humid climates during the summer months. It can affect up to 30% of adults living in hot and humid conditions. It may present as vesicles, papules, or pustules depending on the depth of the eccrine gland obstruction. In adults the rash is most likely seen where clothes rub on the skin. Infants and children typically have lesions on the upper trunk, neck, and head. Miliaria is a clinical diagnosis. Treatment involves measures to reduce sweating and exposure to hot and humid conditions. Air conditioning and the reduced humidity of indoor environments are helpful. If significant inflammation is present with pruritis, some improvement can be seen with 0.1% triamcinolone topically, though ointment should be avoided and only cream or lotion applied.

Take-Home Points

  • Miliaria, or prickly heat, is caused by sweating and blocked eccrine sweat glands.
  • Treatment involves retreating to cool, indoor environments.
  • Triamcinolone 0.1% cream or lotion may reduce pruritis.
  • Guerra KC, Toncar A, Krishnamurthy K. Miliaria. 2023 Aug 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. PMID: 30725861.

By |2024-03-26T10:26:51-07:00Apr 1, 2024|Dermatology, SAEM Clinical Images|
Go to Top